PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DREQX vs. TRBCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DREQX vs. TRBCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Research Growth Fund, Inc. (DREQX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DREQX achieves a 9.37% return, which is significantly higher than TRBCX's 5.48% return. Over the past 10 years, DREQX has underperformed TRBCX with an annualized return of 16.52%, while TRBCX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.69% annualized return.


DREQX

1D
0.00%
1M
6.39%
YTD
9.37%
6M
8.95%
1Y
28.25%
3Y*
23.36%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*
16.52%

TRBCX

1D
-0.69%
1M
5.17%
YTD
5.48%
6M
5.64%
1Y
22.08%
3Y*
28.80%
5Y*
13.81%
10Y*
17.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DREQX vs. TRBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DREQX
BNY Mellon Research Growth Fund, Inc.
9.37%14.96%33.57%42.15%-33.84%19.04%51.43%29.31%0.59%23.68%
TRBCX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund
5.48%18.78%48.46%49.42%-38.57%17.54%34.73%29.97%2.00%36.54%

Correlation

The correlation between DREQX and TRBCX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1993

0.95

The correlation between DREQX and TRBCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DREQX vs. TRBCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DREQX
DREQX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
DREQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DREQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
DREQX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
DREQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
DREQX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

TRBCX
TRBCX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TRBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
TRBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DREQX vs. TRBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Research Growth Fund, Inc. (DREQX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DREQXTRBCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.86

1.37

+0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.51

1.87

+0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.25

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

1.34

+0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.11

4.54

+2.57

DREQX vs. TRBCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DREQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the TRBCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DREQX and TRBCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DREQXTRBCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

1.37

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.58

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.78

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.60

-0.17

Drawdowns

DREQX vs. TRBCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DREQX drawdown since its inception was -52.06%, roughly equal to the maximum TRBCX drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DREQX and TRBCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DREQXTRBCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.06%

-54.56%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.09%

-17.01%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.51%

-23.08%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.53%

-43.63%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.53%

-43.63%

+5.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.69%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.77%

-11.31%

-2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.11%

5.01%

-0.90%

Volatility

DREQX vs. TRBCX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Research Growth Fund, Inc. (DREQX) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX) at 3.57%. This indicates that DREQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRBCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DREQXTRBCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

3.57%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.90%

13.37%

-1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.74%

16.66%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.83%

24.03%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.69%

22.79%

-0.10%

DREQX vs. TRBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DREQX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than TRBCX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

DREQX vs. TRBCX - Dividend Comparison

DREQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.79%, more than TRBCX's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DREQX
BNY Mellon Research Growth Fund, Inc.
13.79%15.09%9.19%3.56%15.70%14.04%10.57%9.67%18.79%9.48%5.68%6.69%
TRBCX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund
4.97%5.25%18.16%3.49%5.87%9.38%1.19%0.36%2.44%2.94%0.67%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


DREQX and TRBCX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DREQX has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to TRBCX (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DREQX dropped -52.06% vs TRBCX's -54.56%.

DREQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DREQX and TRBCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer