PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DRCU.TO vs. RLB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DRCU.TO vs. RLB.TO

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

DRCU.TO (Desjardins RI Active Canadian Bond - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF) and RLB.TO (RBC 1-5 Year Laddered Canadian Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRCU.TO is a Sustainable fund actively managed by Desjardins, while RLB.TO is a Total Bond Market fund actively managed by RBC. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRCU.TO returned 0.49%/yr vs 2.08%/yr for RLB.TO. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DRCU.TO vs. RLB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Desjardins RI Active Canadian Bond - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRCU.TO) and RBC 1-5 Year Laddered Canadian Bond ETF (RLB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRCU.TO achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than RLB.TO's 1.12% return.

DRCU.TO

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.80%
6M
0.44%
YTD
0.50%
1Y
4.19%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
0.49%
10Y*
—

RLB.TO

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.00%
6M
0.91%
YTD
1.12%
1Y
3.13%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
2.08%
10Y*
2.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRCU.TO vs. RLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DRCU.TO
Desjardins RI Active Canadian Bond - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		0.50%3.11%5.29%6.29%-11.24%-3.01%7.92%8.54%0.21%
RLB.TO
RBC 1-5 Year Laddered Canadian Bond ETF		1.12%3.97%5.39%5.93%-5.15%-0.78%5.76%4.54%0.68%

Correlation

The correlation between DRCU.TO and RLB.TO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2018

0.28

The correlation between DRCU.TO and RLB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Desjardins RI Active Canadian Bond - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF

RBC 1-5 Year Laddered Canadian Bond ETF

Often compared with DRCU.TO:
DRCU.TO vs. DCU.TODRCU.TO vs. WSRI.TODRCU.TO vs. NSCE.TODRCU.TO vs. DANC.TODRCU.TO vs. DCBC.TODRCU.TO vs. DCC.TODRCU.TO vs. DCG.TO
Often compared with RLB.TO:
RLB.TO vs. RPDH.TORLB.TO vs. CDLB.TORLB.TO vs. DCU.TORLB.TO vs. MKB.TORLB.TO vs. QBB.TORLB.TO vs. RBO.TORLB.TO vs. RID.TO

Return for Risk

DRCU.TO vs. RLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DRCU.TO
DRCU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
DRCU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRCU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRCU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
DRCU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRCU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
RLB.TO
RLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
RLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
RLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRCU.TO vs. RLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Desjardins RI Active Canadian Bond - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRCU.TO) and RBC 1-5 Year Laddered Canadian Bond ETF (RLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DRCU.TORLB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.99
1.35

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.42
1.95

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.27

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

2.13

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.10

6.71

-2.61

DRCU.TO vs. RLB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRCU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the RLB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRCU.TO and RLB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRCU.TO vs. RLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRCU.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.29%, which is greater than RLB.TO's maximum drawdown of -13.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRCU.TO and RLB.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DRCU.TORLB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.29%

-13.93%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.61%

-1.48%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.71%

-1.48%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.14%

-7.68%

-8.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-13.93%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-0.27%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.77%

-1.52%

-4.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

0.47%

+0.56%

Volatility

DRCU.TO vs. RLB.TO - Volatility Comparison

Desjardins RI Active Canadian Bond - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRCU.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.07% compared to RBC 1-5 Year Laddered Canadian Bond ETF (RLB.TO) at 0.52%. This indicates that DRCU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DRCU.TORLB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

0.52%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.19%

1.97%

+1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.24%

2.34%

+1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.50%

3.01%

+4.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.72%

4.40%

+3.32%

Dividends

DRCU.TO vs. RLB.TO - Dividend Comparison

DRCU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than RLB.TO's 3.48% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DRCU.TO
Desjardins RI Active Canadian Bond - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		3.43%3.43%3.27%2.62%3.34%2.87%2.69%2.67%0.71%0.00%0.00%
RLB.TO
RBC 1-5 Year Laddered Canadian Bond ETF		3.48%3.25%2.99%2.65%2.54%2.27%2.44%2.66%2.81%2.95%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

DRCU.TO and RLB.TO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRCU.TO is categorized as Sustainable, while RLB.TO is Total Bond Market. They also come from different issuers: Desjardins and RBC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRCU.TO and RLB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer