PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRAG vs. PCCE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRAG vs. PCCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG) and Polen Capital China Growth ETF (PCCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DRAG

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PCCE

1D
-1.53%
1M
0.72%
YTD
-1.00%
6M
-1.44%
1Y
7.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRAG vs. PCCE - Yearly Performance Comparison


DRAG vs. PCCE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DRAG
PCCE

Consumer Cyclical

72.4%
17.3%

Communication Services

17.3%
20.1%

Technology

10.2%
6.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.3%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

19.9%

Healthcare

-

8.0%

Industrials

-

13.7%

Real Estate

-

8.7%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

DRAG
72.4%
PCCE
17.3%

Communication Services

DRAG
17.3%
PCCE
20.1%

Technology

DRAG
10.2%
PCCE
6.1%

Basic Materials

DRAG

-

PCCE
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

DRAG

-

PCCE
4.3%

Energy

DRAG

-

PCCE

-

Financial Services

DRAG

-

PCCE
19.9%

Healthcare

DRAG

-

PCCE
8.0%

Industrials

DRAG

-

PCCE
13.7%

Real Estate

DRAG

-

PCCE
8.7%

Utilities

DRAG

-

PCCE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRAG vs. PCCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRAG

PCCE
PCCE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
PCCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCCE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
PCCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCCE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRAG vs. PCCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG) and Polen Capital China Growth ETF (PCCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DRAG vs. PCCE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRAGPCCEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

Drawdowns

DRAG vs. PCCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRAG drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum PCCE drawdown of -26.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAG and PCCE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRAGPCCEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-26.38%

+26.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-9.66%

+9.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-9.93%

+9.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.30%

Volatility

DRAG vs. PCCE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRAGPCCEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

18.91%

-18.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

26.21%

-26.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

26.21%

-26.21%

DRAG vs. PCCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than PCCE's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRAG vs. PCCE - Dividend Comparison

DRAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PCCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%.


PositionTTM20252024
DRAG
Roundhill China Dragons ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
PCCE
Polen Capital China Growth ETF
2.31%2.29%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, DRAG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRAG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for PCCE.

PCCE has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.00% for DRAG.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Polen. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for DRAG and 1.00% for PCCE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRAG and PCCE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer