PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DPZ vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DPZ vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Domino's Pizza, Inc. (DPZ) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DPZ achieves a -20.19% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 9.13% return. Over the past 10 years, DPZ has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 9.52%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 65.23% annualized return.


DPZ

1D
2.11%
1M
5.28%
6M
-16.89%
YTD
-20.19%
1Y
-28.04%
3Y*
-3.67%
5Y*
-5.59%
10Y*
9.52%
ALL TIME*
19.78%

NVDA

1D
0.23%
1M
-3.52%
6M
9.29%
YTD
9.13%
1Y
18.06%
3Y*
66.27%
5Y*
60.07%
10Y*
65.23%
ALL TIME*
36.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DPZ vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DPZ
Domino's Pizza, Inc.
-20.19%0.88%3.18%20.69%-37.88%48.39%31.63%19.63%32.37%19.82%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
9.13%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between DPZ and NVDA is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2004

0.29

The correlation between DPZ and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DPZ:

$10.94B

NVDA:

$4.92T

EPS

DPZ:

$17.61

NVDA:

$6.53

PE Ratio

DPZ:

18.68

NVDA:

31.15

PEG Ratio

DPZ:

2.67

NVDA:

0.17

PS Ratio

DPZ:

2.22

NVDA:

19.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

DPZ:

$5.03B

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DPZ:

$2.01B

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

DPZ:

$990.62M

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DPZ vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DPZ
DPZ Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
DPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
DPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
DPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DPZ vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Domino's Pizza, Inc. (DPZ) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DPZNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.11

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.69

0.90

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.32

1.90

-3.22

DPZ vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DPZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DPZ and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DPZ vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DPZ drawdown since its inception was -86.66%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPZ and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DPZNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.66%

-89.72%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.58%

-20.21%

-20.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.13%

-36.88%

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.81%

-66.34%

+18.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.81%

-66.34%

+18.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.71%

-13.67%

-24.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.57%

-36.10%

+19.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.27%

9.50%

+11.77%

Volatility

DPZ vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

Domino's Pizza, Inc. (DPZ) has a higher volatility of 13.16% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 10.95%. This indicates that DPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DPZNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.16%

10.95%

+2.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.78%

27.74%

-3.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.63%

35.88%

-7.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.26%

51.81%

-21.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.15%

49.92%

-19.77%

Dividends

DPZ vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

DPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DPZ
Domino's Pizza, Inc.
2.27%1.67%1.44%1.17%1.27%0.67%0.81%0.89%0.89%0.97%0.95%1.11%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

DPZ vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Domino's Pizza, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
1.19B
81.62B
(DPZ) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DPZ vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Domino's Pizza, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
40.0%
74.9%
Portfolio components
DPZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Domino's Pizza, Inc. reported a gross profit of 478.23M and revenue of 1.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

DPZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Domino's Pizza, Inc. reported an operating income of 232.04M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

DPZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Domino's Pizza, Inc. reported a net income of 135.75M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DPZ and NVDA have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DPZ has higher volatility (13.16%) compared to NVDA (10.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DPZ dropped -86.66% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DPZ and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer