DPYA.L vs. IITU.L
DPYA.L (iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - DPYA.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DPYA.L returned 0.70%/yr vs 24.18%/yr for IITU.L. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DPYA.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
DPYA.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DPYA.L is traded in USD, while IITU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IITU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DPYA.L achieves a 6.77% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 22.95% return.
DPYA.L
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- YTD
- 6.77%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 10.62%
- 3Y*
- 8.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.70%
- 10Y*
- —
IITU.L
- 1D
- -2.03%
- 1M
- 13.27%
- YTD
- 22.95%
- 6M
- 22.91%
- 1Y
- 51.92%
- 3Y*
- 34.31%
- 5Y*
- 24.18%
- 10Y*
- 26.34%
DPYA.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPYA.L iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 6.77% | 9.25% | -0.10% | 9.70% | -24.03% | 25.35% | -9.35% | 21.05% | -4.06% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 22.95% | 23.07% | 38.50% | 58.65% | -29.11% | 34.44% | 42.58% | 49.99% | -11.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between DPYA.L and IITU.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DPYA.L and IITU.L has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DPYA.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DPYA.L
IITU.L
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
DPYA.L
IITU.L
-
Financial Services
DPYA.L
IITU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
DPYA.L
IITU.L
-
Basic Materials
DPYA.L
-
IITU.L
-
Communication Services
DPYA.L
-
IITU.L
-
Consumer Defensive
DPYA.L
-
IITU.L
-
Energy
DPYA.L
-
IITU.L
Healthcare
DPYA.L
-
IITU.L
-
Industrials
DPYA.L
-
IITU.L
Technology
DPYA.L
-
IITU.L
Utilities
DPYA.L
-
IITU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DPYA.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
DPYA.L
IITU.L
DPYA.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DPYA.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.41 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 3.07 | -2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.66 | 9.27 | -5.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DPYA.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 2.58 | -1.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 1.04 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 1.14 | -0.97 |
Drawdowns
DPYA.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DPYA.L drawdown since its inception was -42.96%, which is greater than IITU.L's maximum drawdown of -34.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPYA.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DPYA.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.96% | -34.22% | -8.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.97% | -16.80% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.07% | -26.42% | +8.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.79% | -34.22% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.81% | -3.20% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.39% | -5.93% | -6.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 5.59% | -2.69% |
Volatility
DPYA.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA.L) is 3.57%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.00%. This indicates that DPYA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DPYA.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 7.00% | -3.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.15% | 15.11% | -5.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.02% | 20.05% | -8.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 23.19% | -6.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 21.85% | -3.60% |
DPYA.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DPYA.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
DPYA.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DPYA.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DPYA.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for DPYA.L.
DPYA.L is categorized as REIT, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. DPYA.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for DPYA.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for DPYA.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer