DPYA.L vs. HPRD.L
DPYA.L (iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and HPRD.L (HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, from iShares and HSBC respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DPYA.L returned 0.70%/yr vs 1.18%/yr for HPRD.L. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DPYA.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for HPRD.L.
Performance
DPYA.L vs. HPRD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DPYA.L having a 6.77% return and HPRD.L slightly lower at 6.60%.
DPYA.L
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- YTD
- 6.77%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 10.62%
- 3Y*
- 8.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.70%
- 10Y*
- —
HPRD.L
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 7.06%
- 1Y
- 11.93%
- 3Y*
- 9.23%
- 5Y*
- 1.18%
- 10Y*
- 3.52%
DPYA.L vs. HPRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPYA.L iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 6.77% | 9.25% | -0.10% | 9.70% | -24.03% | 25.35% | -9.35% | 21.05% | -4.06% |
HPRD.L HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF | 6.60% | 10.90% | -0.19% | 10.88% | -24.76% | 26.43% | -8.89% | 20.96% | -4.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between DPYA.L and HPRD.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018 | 0.98 |
The correlation between DPYA.L and HPRD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
DPYA.L vs. HPRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DPYA.L
HPRD.L
Real Estate
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
DPYA.L
HPRD.L
Financial Services
DPYA.L
HPRD.L
Consumer Cyclical
DPYA.L
HPRD.L
Basic Materials
DPYA.L
-
HPRD.L
-
Communication Services
DPYA.L
-
HPRD.L
-
Consumer Defensive
DPYA.L
-
HPRD.L
-
Energy
DPYA.L
-
HPRD.L
-
Healthcare
DPYA.L
-
HPRD.L
-
Industrials
DPYA.L
-
HPRD.L
-
Technology
DPYA.L
-
HPRD.L
Utilities
DPYA.L
-
HPRD.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DPYA.L vs. HPRD.L — Risk / Return Rank
DPYA.L
HPRD.L
DPYA.L vs. HPRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA.L) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DPYA.L | HPRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.18 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 1.17 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.66 | 4.33 | -0.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DPYA.L | HPRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 0.99 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.07 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.31 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
DPYA.L vs. HPRD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DPYA.L drawdown since its inception was -42.96%, roughly equal to the maximum HPRD.L drawdown of -41.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPYA.L and HPRD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DPYA.L | HPRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.96% | -41.81% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.97% | -10.12% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.07% | -18.25% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.79% | -33.48% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.81% | -3.76% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.39% | -9.43% | -2.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 2.75% | +0.15% |
Volatility
DPYA.L vs. HPRD.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA.L) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L) have volatilities of 3.57% and 3.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DPYA.L | HPRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 3.69% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.15% | 9.30% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.02% | 11.99% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 16.32% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 16.93% | +1.32% |
DPYA.L vs. HPRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DPYA.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than HPRD.L's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
DPYA.L vs. HPRD.L - Dividend Comparison
DPYA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HPRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPYA.L iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HPRD.L HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF | 3.06% | 3.17% | 3.39% | 3.35% | 3.53% | 2.30% | 2.88% | 2.96% | 3.43% | 2.89% | 3.13% | 2.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, DPYA.L and HPRD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, HPRD.L is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HPRD.L is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for DPYA.L.
Both ETFs track FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for DPYA.L and 0.24% for HPRD.L.
Find the right allocation for DPYA.L and HPRD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer