PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DPYA.L vs. HPRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DPYA.L vs. HPRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA.L) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DPYA.L having a 6.77% return and HPRD.L slightly lower at 6.60%.


DPYA.L

1D
0.28%
1M
-1.15%
YTD
6.77%
6M
7.84%
1Y
10.62%
3Y*
8.60%
5Y*
0.70%
10Y*

HPRD.L

1D
0.13%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
6.60%
6M
7.06%
1Y
11.93%
3Y*
9.23%
5Y*
1.18%
10Y*
3.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DPYA.L vs. HPRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DPYA.L
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
6.77%9.25%-0.10%9.70%-24.03%25.35%-9.35%21.05%-4.06%
HPRD.L
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF
6.60%10.90%-0.19%10.88%-24.76%26.43%-8.89%20.96%-4.41%

Correlation

The correlation between DPYA.L and HPRD.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2018

0.98

The correlation between DPYA.L and HPRD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

DPYA.L vs. HPRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DPYA.L
HPRD.L

Real Estate

100.0%
98.3%

Financial Services

0.1%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

0.3%

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

DPYA.L
100.0%
HPRD.L
98.3%

Financial Services

DPYA.L
0.1%
HPRD.L
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DPYA.L
0.0%
HPRD.L
0.1%

Basic Materials

DPYA.L

-

HPRD.L

-

Communication Services

DPYA.L

-

HPRD.L

-

Consumer Defensive

DPYA.L

-

HPRD.L

-

Energy

DPYA.L

-

HPRD.L

-

Healthcare

DPYA.L

-

HPRD.L

-

Industrials

DPYA.L

-

HPRD.L

-

Technology

DPYA.L

-

HPRD.L
0.3%

Utilities

DPYA.L

-

HPRD.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DPYA.L vs. HPRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DPYA.L
DPYA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
DPYA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DPYA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
DPYA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
DPYA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
DPYA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

HPRD.L
HPRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
HPRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
HPRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DPYA.L vs. HPRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA.L) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DPYA.LHPRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.18

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

1.17

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.66

4.33

-0.67

DPYA.L vs. HPRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DPYA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the HPRD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DPYA.L and HPRD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DPYA.LHPRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

0.99

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.07

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.31

-0.14

Drawdowns

DPYA.L vs. HPRD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DPYA.L drawdown since its inception was -42.96%, roughly equal to the maximum HPRD.L drawdown of -41.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPYA.L and HPRD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DPYA.LHPRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.96%

-41.81%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.97%

-10.12%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.07%

-18.25%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.79%

-33.48%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.81%

-3.76%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.39%

-9.43%

-2.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.75%

+0.15%

Volatility

DPYA.L vs. HPRD.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPYA.L) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L) have volatilities of 3.57% and 3.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DPYA.LHPRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

3.69%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

9.30%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.02%

11.99%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.23%

16.32%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.25%

16.93%

+1.32%

DPYA.L vs. HPRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DPYA.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than HPRD.L's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

DPYA.L vs. HPRD.L - Dividend Comparison

DPYA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HPRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DPYA.L
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HPRD.L
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF
3.06%3.17%3.39%3.35%3.53%2.30%2.88%2.96%3.43%2.89%3.13%2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, DPYA.L and HPRD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, HPRD.L is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HPRD.L is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for DPYA.L.

Both ETFs track FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for DPYA.L and 0.24% for HPRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DPYA.L and HPRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer