PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DPRO vs. IWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DPRO vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Draganfly Inc (DPRO) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DPRO vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DPRO
Draganfly Inc
-28.94%72.32%-66.55%-36.07%-53.99%-48.90%32.97%-0.99%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.93%12.66%11.38%16.83%-20.48%14.54%20.03%3.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DPRO achieves a -28.94% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 0.93% return.


DPRO

1D
11.09%
1M
-25.04%
YTD
-28.94%
6M
-39.68%
1Y
79.20%
3Y*
-46.46%
5Y*
-53.92%
10Y*

IWM

1D
3.50%
1M
-4.96%
YTD
0.93%
6M
3.02%
1Y
25.66%
3Y*
12.94%
5Y*
3.34%
10Y*
9.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DPRO vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DPRO
DPRO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

IWM
IWM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DPRO vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Draganfly Inc (DPRO) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DPROIWMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.56

1.11

-0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

1.66

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.21

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

1.82

-0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.50

6.76

-4.26

DPRO vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DPRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DPRO and IWM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DPROIWMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

1.11

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.46

0.15

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

0.34

-0.58

Correlation

The correlation between DPRO and IWM is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

DPRO vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

DPRO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DPRO
Draganfly Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
1.02%1.04%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%

Drawdowns

DPRO vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DPRO drawdown since its inception was -99.56%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPRO and IWM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DPROIWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.56%

-59.05%

-40.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.90%

-13.74%

-54.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.28%

-31.91%

-67.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.73%

-7.91%

-90.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-83.30%

-10.83%

-72.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.26%

3.70%

+32.56%

Volatility

DPRO vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

Draganfly Inc (DPRO) has a higher volatility of 34.28% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 7.47%. This indicates that DPRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DPROIWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

34.28%

7.47%

+26.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

89.38%

14.47%

+74.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

141.30%

23.18%

+118.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

116.69%

22.55%

+94.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

140.24%

22.99%

+117.25%