DPGC.L vs. INFR.L
DPGC.L (Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc) and INFR.L (iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - DPGC.L is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while INFR.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. DPGC.L is actively managed, while INFR.L is passively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DPGC.L charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for INFR.L.
Performance
DPGC.L vs. INFR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DPGC.L is traded in GBP, while INFR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INFR.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DPGC.L achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly higher than INFR.L's 9.41% return.
DPGC.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INFR.L
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- 9.41%
- 6M
- 7.19%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 9.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.77%
DPGC.L vs. INFR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DPGC.L Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.15% | 2.40% |
INFR.L iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 9.41% | -1.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between DPGC.L and INFR.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DPGC.L vs. INFR.L — Risk / Return Rank
DPGC.L
INFR.L
DPGC.L vs. INFR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (DPGC.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DPGC.L | INFR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.22 | 0.52 | +2.70 |
Drawdowns
DPGC.L vs. INFR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DPGC.L drawdown since its inception was -6.24%, smaller than the maximum INFR.L drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPGC.L and INFR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DPGC.L | INFR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -34.25% | +28.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.80% | +3.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.26% | -6.12% | +4.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.03% | — |
Volatility
DPGC.L vs. INFR.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DPGC.L | INFR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.15% | 10.34% | -1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.15% | 12.24% | -3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.15% | 14.09% | -4.94% |
DPGC.L vs. INFR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DPGC.L has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
DPGC.L vs. INFR.L - Dividend Comparison
DPGC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INFR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPGC.L Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INFR.L iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.82% | 2.97% | 2.96% | 3.02% | 2.54% | 2.60% | 2.84% | 2.70% | 2.99% | 3.51% | 3.45% | 4.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DPGC.L and INFR.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DPGC.L is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DPGC.L is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INFR.L.
DPGC.L is categorized as Global Equities, while INFR.L is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for DPGC.L and 0.65% for INFR.L.
Find the right allocation for DPGC.L and INFR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer