PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DPFNX vs. FIQTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DPFNX vs. FIQTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Deer Park Total Return Credit Fund (DPFNX) and Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class Z (FIQTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DPFNX achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than FIQTX's 7.64% return.


DPFNX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
0.25%
6M
0.12%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
3.18%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
3.15%

FIQTX

1D
0.32%
1M
2.16%
YTD
7.64%
6M
8.58%
1Y
16.97%
3Y*
12.73%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DPFNX vs. FIQTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DPFNX
Deer Park Total Return Credit Fund
0.25%7.02%-1.43%4.48%-11.14%8.02%0.97%5.25%-1.16%
FIQTX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class Z
7.64%12.17%10.38%12.37%-11.16%11.13%9.06%17.93%-6.84%

Correlation

The correlation between DPFNX and FIQTX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DPFNX vs. FIQTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DPFNX
DPFNX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
DPFNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DPFNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DPFNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
DPFNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
DPFNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

FIQTX
FIQTX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FIQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DPFNX vs. FIQTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deer Park Total Return Credit Fund (DPFNX) and Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class Z (FIQTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DPFNXFIQTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

3.21

-1.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.90

4.73

-2.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.65

-0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

5.73

-3.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.97

24.30

-20.33

DPFNX vs. FIQTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DPFNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the FIQTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DPFNX and FIQTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DPFNXFIQTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

3.21

-1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

1.08

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.94

-0.17

Drawdowns

DPFNX vs. FIQTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DPFNX drawdown since its inception was -21.04%, smaller than the maximum FIQTX drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPFNX and FIQTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DPFNXFIQTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.04%

-28.49%

+7.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.10%

-3.12%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.55%

-6.96%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.32%

-15.16%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

0.00%

-1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-3.30%

-0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

0.73%

+0.22%

Volatility

DPFNX vs. FIQTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Deer Park Total Return Credit Fund (DPFNX) is 0.90%, while Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class Z (FIQTX) has a volatility of 1.70%. This indicates that DPFNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIQTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DPFNXFIQTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

1.70%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.00%

4.39%

-2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11%

5.57%

-2.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.32%

6.40%

-3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.42%

8.36%

-3.94%

DPFNX vs. FIQTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DPFNX has a 1.77% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQTX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

DPFNX vs. FIQTX - Dividend Comparison

DPFNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.66%, more than FIQTX's 4.48% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DPFNX
Deer Park Total Return Credit Fund
7.66%6.82%7.44%6.83%6.06%5.04%5.16%5.63%6.11%4.46%5.17%
FIQTX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class Z
4.48%4.83%5.06%4.79%7.43%5.01%3.80%4.61%2.54%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DPFNX and FIQTX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIQTX has higher volatility (1.70%) compared to DPFNX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DPFNX dropped -21.04% vs FIQTX's -28.49%.

FIQTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DPFNX and FIQTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer