PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DPAY.L vs. XLKQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DPAY.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Digital Payments UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPAY.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DPAY.L is traded in USD, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DPAY.L achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 17.97% return.


DPAY.L

1D
2.94%
1M
10.78%
6M
4.05%
YTD
2.53%
1Y
-5.75%
3Y*
3.47%
5Y*
-5.68%
10Y*

XLKQ.L

1D
-0.46%
1M
-2.56%
6M
20.54%
YTD
17.97%
1Y
32.89%
3Y*
31.49%
5Y*
22.29%
10Y*
25.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DPAY.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DPAY.L
L&G Digital Payments UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.53%-7.05%14.10%20.99%-31.30%-15.88%
XLKQ.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc
17.97%24.49%41.63%59.85%-29.07%25.89%

Correlation

The correlation between DPAY.L and XLKQ.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.58

The correlation between DPAY.L and XLKQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DPAY.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DPAY.L
DPAY.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
DPAY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DPAY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
DPAY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
DPAY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
DPAY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

XLKQ.L
XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DPAY.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Digital Payments UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPAY.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DPAY.LXLKQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.26

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

1.95

-2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.38

5.35

-5.73

DPAY.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DPAY.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DPAY.L and XLKQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DPAY.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DPAY.L drawdown since its inception was -50.59%, which is greater than XLKQ.L's maximum drawdown of -39.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPAY.L and XLKQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DPAY.LXLKQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.59%

-39.80%

-10.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.54%

-16.81%

-10.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.54%

-26.96%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.27%

-35.00%

-15.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.35%

-7.48%

-20.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.89%

-9.18%

-22.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.23%

6.13%

+9.10%

Volatility

DPAY.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Digital Payments UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPAY.L) has a higher volatility of 8.80% compared to Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) at 7.47%. This indicates that DPAY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DPAY.LXLKQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.80%

7.47%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.54%

17.08%

+2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.66%

21.52%

+2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.18%

27.46%

-1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.88%

23.97%

+1.91%

DPAY.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DPAY.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

DPAY.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DPAY.L nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DPAY.L and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DPAY.L.

DPAY.L tracks Solactive Digital Payments Index NTR, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DPAY.L and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DPAY.L and XLKQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer