PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DPAY.L vs. LDUK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DPAY.L vs. LDUK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Digital Payments UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPAY.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF (LDUK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DPAY.L is traded in USD, while LDUK.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LDUK.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DPAY.L achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than LDUK.L's 8.16% return.


DPAY.L

1D
2.94%
1M
10.78%
6M
4.05%
YTD
2.53%
1Y
-5.75%
3Y*
3.47%
5Y*
-5.68%
10Y*

LDUK.L

1D
1.68%
1M
3.06%
6M
7.33%
YTD
8.16%
1Y
18.16%
3Y*
20.32%
5Y*
10.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DPAY.L vs. LDUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DPAY.L
L&G Digital Payments UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.53%-7.05%14.10%20.99%-31.30%-15.88%
LDUK.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF
8.16%31.88%14.20%13.93%-13.70%-1.19%

Correlation

The correlation between DPAY.L and LDUK.L is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.58

The correlation between DPAY.L and LDUK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DPAY.L vs. LDUK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DPAY.L
DPAY.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
DPAY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DPAY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
DPAY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
DPAY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
DPAY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

LDUK.L
LDUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LDUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
LDUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DPAY.L vs. LDUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Digital Payments UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPAY.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF (LDUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DPAY.LLDUK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.19

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

1.35

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.38

4.68

-5.06

DPAY.L vs. LDUK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DPAY.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the LDUK.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DPAY.L and LDUK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DPAY.L vs. LDUK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DPAY.L drawdown since its inception was -50.59%, which is greater than LDUK.L's maximum drawdown of -33.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPAY.L and LDUK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DPAY.LLDUK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.59%

-33.32%

-17.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.54%

-13.36%

-14.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.54%

-15.30%

-12.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.27%

-33.17%

-17.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.35%

0.00%

-28.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.89%

-7.48%

-24.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.23%

3.87%

+11.36%

Volatility

DPAY.L vs. LDUK.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Digital Payments UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DPAY.L) has a higher volatility of 8.80% compared to L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF (LDUK.L) at 4.02%. This indicates that DPAY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DPAY.LLDUK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.80%

4.02%

+4.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.54%

14.07%

+5.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.66%

17.09%

+6.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.18%

18.85%

+7.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.88%

18.86%

+7.02%

DPAY.L vs. LDUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DPAY.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LDUK.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

DPAY.L vs. LDUK.L - Dividend Comparison

DPAY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DPAY.L
L&G Digital Payments UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LDUK.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF
4.67%4.87%4.43%5.14%5.87%4.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


DPAY.L and LDUK.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LDUK.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LDUK.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DPAY.L.

DPAY.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while LDUK.L is Europe Equities. DPAY.L tracks Solactive Digital Payments Index NTR, while LDUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DPAY.L and 0.25% for LDUK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DPAY.L and LDUK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer