PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DPAG.L vs. ITEC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DPAG.L vs. ITEC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Digital Payments UCITS ETF (DPAG.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Technology UCITS ETF (ITEC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DPAG.L is traded in GBp, while ITEC.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ITEC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DPAG.L achieves a -9.59% return, which is significantly lower than ITEC.L's 49.74% return.


DPAG.L

1D
1.91%
1M
-2.50%
YTD
-9.59%
6M
-8.97%
1Y
-12.88%
3Y*
-1.36%
5Y*
10Y*

ITEC.L

1D
0.24%
1M
20.74%
YTD
49.74%
6M
46.16%
1Y
63.94%
3Y*
24.82%
5Y*
15.28%
10Y*
17.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DPAG.L vs. ITEC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DPAG.L
L&G Digital Payments UCITS ETF
-9.59%-13.44%16.00%14.33%-22.74%-13.31%
ITEC.L
SPDR® MSCI Europe Technology UCITS ETF
49.74%15.55%3.61%32.30%-24.48%14.04%

Correlation

The correlation between DPAG.L and ITEC.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2021

0.57

The correlation between DPAG.L and ITEC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DPAG.L vs. ITEC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DPAG.L
DPAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
DPAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DPAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
DPAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
DPAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
DPAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

ITEC.L
ITEC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ITEC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITEC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITEC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ITEC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITEC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DPAG.L vs. ITEC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Digital Payments UCITS ETF (DPAG.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Technology UCITS ETF (ITEC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DPAG.LITEC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.42

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

5.30

-5.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.95

13.46

-14.41

DPAG.L vs. ITEC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DPAG.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the ITEC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DPAG.L and ITEC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DPAG.LITEC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.64

2.55

-3.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.30

0.70

-1.00

Drawdowns

DPAG.L vs. ITEC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DPAG.L drawdown since its inception was -43.44%, which is greater than ITEC.L's maximum drawdown of -37.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPAG.L and ITEC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DPAG.LITEC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.44%

-37.70%

-5.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.15%

-12.01%

-14.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.08%

-25.71%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.80%

0.00%

-34.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.06%

-8.32%

-18.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.51%

4.74%

+8.77%

Volatility

DPAG.L vs. ITEC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Digital Payments UCITS ETF (DPAG.L) is 7.13%, while SPDR® MSCI Europe Technology UCITS ETF (ITEC.L) has a volatility of 10.22%. This indicates that DPAG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITEC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DPAG.LITEC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.13%

10.22%

-3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.00%

20.30%

-5.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.16%

25.02%

-4.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.26%

25.40%

-1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.26%

23.87%

+0.39%

DPAG.L vs. ITEC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DPAG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ITEC.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

DPAG.L vs. ITEC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DPAG.L nor ITEC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DPAG.L and ITEC.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ITEC.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ITEC.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DPAG.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DPAG.L and 0.18% for ITEC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DPAG.L and ITEC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer