DOO.TO vs. NA.TO
DOO.TO (BRP Inc.) and NA.TO (National Bank of Canada) are both stocks. DOO.TO operates in Recreational Vehicles (Consumer Cyclical), while NA.TO operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, DOO.TO returned 16.80%/yr vs 21.05%/yr for NA.TO. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DOO.TO vs. NA.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOO.TO achieves a -9.59% return, which is significantly lower than NA.TO's 18.69% return. Over the past 10 years, DOO.TO has underperformed NA.TO with an annualized return of 16.80%, while NA.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.05% annualized return.
DOO.TO
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- 14.42%
- YTD
- -9.59%
- 6M
- -17.13%
- 1Y
- 37.74%
- 3Y*
- -3.11%
- 5Y*
- -1.03%
- 10Y*
- 16.80%
NA.TO
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- 18.69%
- 6M
- 20.83%
- 1Y
- 57.10%
- 3Y*
- 33.37%
- 5Y*
- 21.58%
- 10Y*
- 21.05%
DOO.TO vs. NA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOO.TO BRP Inc. | -9.59% | 34.45% | -22.01% | -7.49% | -6.06% | 32.65% | 42.33% | 69.06% | -23.45% | 64.99% |
NA.TO National Bank of Canada | 18.69% | 36.15% | 35.91% | 15.53% | -1.45% | 39.02% | 4.01% | 34.04% | -6.92% | 19.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOO.TO and NA.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2013 | 0.30 |
Fundamentals
DOO.TO:
CA$6.47B
NA.TO:
CA$79.64B
DOO.TO:
CA$3.66
NA.TO:
CA$11.69
DOO.TO:
23.91
NA.TO:
17.40
DOO.TO:
0.32
NA.TO:
4.87
DOO.TO:
0.72
NA.TO:
2.94
DOO.TO:
9.29
NA.TO:
2.57
DOO.TO:
CA$8.99B
NA.TO:
CA$27.33B
DOO.TO:
CA$2.05B
NA.TO:
CA$14.01B
DOO.TO:
CA$1.14B
NA.TO:
CA$6.37B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOO.TO vs. NA.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DOO.TO
NA.TO
DOO.TO vs. NA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BRP Inc. (DOO.TO) and National Bank of Canada (NA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DOO.TO | NA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.66 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 6.27 | -5.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | 21.32 | -18.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DOO.TO | NA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 3.53 | -2.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 1.24 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 1.01 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.59 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
DOO.TO vs. NA.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOO.TO drawdown since its inception was -73.61%, which is greater than NA.TO's maximum drawdown of -58.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOO.TO and NA.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOO.TO | NA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.61% | -58.47% | -15.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.38% | -8.99% | -28.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.52% | -22.58% | -39.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.08% | -22.58% | -40.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.61% | -48.22% | -25.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.08% | -4.66% | -22.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.98% | -10.64% | -10.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.58% | 2.64% | +10.94% |
Volatility
DOO.TO vs. NA.TO - Volatility Comparison
BRP Inc. (DOO.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.85% compared to National Bank of Canada (NA.TO) at 6.18%. This indicates that DOO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOO.TO | NA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.85% | 6.18% | +2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.77% | 13.83% | +37.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.82% | 15.98% | +36.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.00% | 17.49% | +24.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.43% | 20.98% | +23.45% |
Dividends
DOO.TO vs. NA.TO - Dividend Comparison
DOO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than NA.TO's 2.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOO.TO BRP Inc. | 1.19% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 0.76% | 0.74% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.81% | 1.02% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NA.TO National Bank of Canada | 2.38% | 2.75% | 4.17% | 4.03% | 4.03% | 3.11% | 3.96% | 3.77% | 4.44% | 3.70% | 4.03% | 5.16% |
Financials
DOO.TO vs. NA.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BRP Inc. and National Bank of Canada. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DOO.TO vs. NA.TO - Profitability Comparison
DOO.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BRP Inc. reported a gross profit of 561.60M and revenue of 2.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.
NA.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Bank of Canada reported a gross profit of 3.66B and revenue of 8.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.4%.
DOO.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BRP Inc. reported an operating income of 222.30M and revenue of 2.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.3%.
NA.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Bank of Canada reported an operating income of 1.62B and revenue of 8.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.0%.
DOO.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BRP Inc. reported a net income of 129.50M and revenue of 2.39B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.
NA.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Bank of Canada reported a net income of 1.23B and revenue of 8.07B, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DOO.TO and NA.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for DOO.TO and NA.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer