DOMH vs. SBET
DOMH (Dominari Holdings Inc.) and SBET (SharpLink Gaming Ltd.) are both stocks. DOMH operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while SBET operates in Gambling (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past year, DOMH returned -6.66% vs -88.98% for SBET. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DOMH vs. SBET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOMH achieves a -21.17% return, which is significantly higher than SBET's -38.03% return.
DOMH
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- 12.90%
- YTD
- -21.17%
- 6M
- -8.83%
- 1Y
- -6.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.78%
- 5Y*
- -25.07%
- 10Y*
- -31.47%
SBET
- 1D
- -4.65%
- 1M
- -26.82%
- YTD
- -38.03%
- 6M
- -47.69%
- 1Y
- -88.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DOMH vs. SBET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DOMH Dominari Holdings Inc. | -21.17% | 443.18% | -53.57% |
SBET SharpLink Gaming Ltd. | -38.03% | 15.65% | -52.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOMH and SBET is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2024 | 0.26 |
The correlation between DOMH and SBET shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DOMH:
-$0.38
SBET:
-$14.63
DOMH:
1.55
SBET:
13.65
DOMH:
$123.10M
SBET:
$39.37M
DOMH:
-$22.17M
SBET:
$37.65M
DOMH:
$72.34M
SBET:
-$504.51M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOMH vs. SBET — Risk / Return Rank
DOMH
SBET
DOMH vs. SBET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dominari Holdings Inc. (DOMH) and SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DOMH | SBET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.88 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | -0.98 | +0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.18 | -1.12 | +0.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DOMH | SBET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | -0.62 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.19 | -0.11 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
DOMH vs. SBET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOMH drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SBET's maximum drawdown of -93.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOMH and SBET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOMH | SBET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -93.01% | -6.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.33% | -90.64% | +31.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -93.01% | -6.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.20% | -65.70% | -9.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.93% | 79.14% | -42.21% |
Volatility
DOMH vs. SBET - Volatility Comparison
Dominari Holdings Inc. (DOMH) has a higher volatility of 26.59% compared to SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET) at 18.65%. This indicates that DOMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOMH | SBET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.59% | 18.65% | +7.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.55% | 56.20% | -3.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.56% | 143.78% | -55.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 99.71% | 341.43% | -241.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 126.22% | 341.43% | -215.21% |
Dividends
DOMH vs. SBET - Dividend Comparison
DOMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.82%, while SBET has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DOMH Dominari Holdings Inc. | 29.82% | 10.91% |
SBET SharpLink Gaming Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
DOMH vs. SBET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dominari Holdings Inc. and SharpLink Gaming Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
DOMH and SBET have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DOMH has higher volatility (26.59%) compared to SBET (18.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOMH dropped -100.00% vs SBET's -93.01%.
DOMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DOMH and SBET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer