PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DOGG vs. SPIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DOGG vs. SPIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOGG achieves a 5.09% return, which is significantly higher than SPIN's 2.91% return.


DOGG

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.22%
YTD
5.09%
6M
4.26%
1Y
15.85%
3Y*
11.91%
5Y*
10Y*

SPIN

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.52%
YTD
2.91%
6M
3.47%
1Y
19.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DOGG vs. SPIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DOGG
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF
5.09%19.43%-2.97%
SPIN
State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF
2.91%14.14%6.09%

Correlation

The correlation between DOGG and SPIN is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024

0.22

DOGG vs. SPIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DOGG
SPIN

Consumer Cyclical

30.1%
8.7%

Healthcare

29.9%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

19.9%
3.8%

Communication Services

10.2%
12.2%

Energy

10.0%
2.9%

Basic Materials

-

2.2%

Financial Services

-

11.5%

Industrials

-

8.0%

Real Estate

-

1.6%

Technology

-

39.0%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DOGG
30.1%
SPIN
8.7%

Healthcare

DOGG
29.9%
SPIN
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

DOGG
19.9%
SPIN
3.8%

Communication Services

DOGG
10.2%
SPIN
12.2%

Energy

DOGG
10.0%
SPIN
2.9%

Basic Materials

DOGG

-

SPIN
2.2%

Financial Services

DOGG

-

SPIN
11.5%

Industrials

DOGG

-

SPIN
8.0%

Real Estate

DOGG

-

SPIN
1.6%

Technology

DOGG

-

SPIN
39.0%

Utilities

DOGG

-

SPIN
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DOGG vs. SPIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DOGG
DOGG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
DOGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOGG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DOGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

SPIN
SPIN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIN Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIN Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DOGG vs. SPIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DOGGSPINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.36

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

2.02

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.53

8.42

-3.88

DOGG vs. SPIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DOGG Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the SPIN Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOGG and SPIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DOGGSPINDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

1.89

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.95

-0.10

Drawdowns

DOGG vs. SPIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOGG drawdown since its inception was -11.19%, smaller than the maximum SPIN drawdown of -16.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOGG and SPIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DOGGSPINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.19%

-16.85%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-9.81%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.62%

-0.40%

-7.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-2.29%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

2.35%

+1.15%

Volatility

DOGG vs. SPIN - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) has a higher volatility of 3.20% compared to State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) at 1.82%. This indicates that DOGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DOGGSPINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

1.82%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.04%

8.03%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.43%

10.49%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.97%

14.33%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.97%

14.33%

-1.36%

DOGG vs. SPIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DOGG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPIN's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

DOGG vs. SPIN - Dividend Comparison

DOGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.90%, more than SPIN's 5.64% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DOGG
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF
8.90%8.75%9.92%5.89%
SPIN
State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF
5.64%8.20%2.36%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DOGG and SPIN have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DOGG has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to SPIN (1.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOGG dropped -11.19% vs SPIN's -16.85%.

On 1-year performance, SPIN leads with 19.71% vs 15.85% for DOGG. On fees, SPIN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPIN has been the lower-risk option at 1.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPIN has performed better with a 19.71% return vs 15.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPIN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DOGG.

DOGG has the higher dividend yield at 8.90%, compared with 5.64% for SPIN.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DOGG and 0.25% for SPIN.

SPIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DOGG and SPIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer