DOGG vs. RDVI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DOGG (FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF) and RDVI (FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from FT Vest. DOGG is actively managed, while RDVI is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DOGG returned 11.91%/yr vs 18.62%/yr for RDVI. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

DOGG vs. RDVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) and FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOGG achieves a 5.09% return, which is significantly lower than RDVI's 9.43% return.

DOGG

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 5.09%
• 6M: 4.26%
• 1Y: 15.85%
• 3Y*: 11.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RDVI

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 2.77%
• YTD: 9.43%
• 6M: 10.61%
• 1Y: 24.98%
• 3Y*: 18.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DOGG vs. RDVI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF	5.09%	19.43%	-2.58%	12.69%
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF	9.43%	17.93%	14.56%	15.18%

Correlation

The correlation between DOGG and RDVI is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2023	0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between DOGG and RDVI has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DOGG vs. RDVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DOGG	RDVI
Consumer Cyclical	30.1%	12.2%
Healthcare	29.9%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	19.9%	4.1%
Communication Services	10.2%	5.4%
Energy	10.0%	1.4%
Basic Materials	-	-
Financial Services	-	36.5%
Industrials	-	12.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	17.6%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

DOGG vs. RDVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DOGG

DOGG Risk / Return Rank: 40
DOGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
DOGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
DOGG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
DOGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
DOGG Martin Ratio Rank: 31

RDVI

RDVI Risk / Return Rank: 58
RDVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
RDVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
RDVI Omega Ratio Rank: 54
RDVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
RDVI Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DOGG vs. RDVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) and FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DOGG	RDVI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	1.89	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	2.74	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.34	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	2.96	-1.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.53	12.48	-7.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DOGG vs. RDVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DOGG Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the RDVI Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOGG and RDVI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DOGG	RDVI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53	1.89	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	1.19	-0.34

Drawdowns

DOGG vs. RDVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOGG drawdown since its inception was -11.19%, smaller than the maximum RDVI drawdown of -18.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOGG and RDVI.

Drawdown Indicators

	DOGG	RDVI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.19%	-18.35%	+7.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.29%	-8.48%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.19%	-18.35%	+7.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.62%	-0.43%	-7.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.22%	-3.17%	-0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	2.01%	+1.49%

Volatility

DOGG vs. RDVI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) is 3.20%, while FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that DOGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DOGG	RDVI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.20%	3.66%	-0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.04%	10.50%	-2.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.43%	13.27%	-2.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.97%	16.91%	-3.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.97%	16.91%	-3.94%

DOGG vs. RDVI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DOGG and RDVI have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

DOGG vs. RDVI - Dividend Comparison

DOGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.90%, more than RDVI's 7.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF	8.90%	8.75%	9.92%	5.89%	0.00%
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF	7.94%	8.10%	8.62%	8.45%	1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DOGG and RDVI in my portfolio?

DOGG and RDVI have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DOGG or RDVI?

RDVI has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to DOGG (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOGG dropped -11.19% vs RDVI's -18.35%.

Which ETF is better, DOGG or RDVI?

On 3-year performance, RDVI leads with 18.62% vs 11.91% for DOGG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, DOGG has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DOGG or RDVI?

Over the 3-year period, RDVI has performed better with a 18.62% return vs 11.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DOGG or RDVI?

DOGG and RDVI have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DOGG or RDVI?

DOGG has the higher dividend yield at 8.90%, compared with 7.94% for RDVI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.