PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DOGG vs. ELCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DOGG vs. ELCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) and Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOGG achieves a 5.09% return, which is significantly lower than ELCV's 21.38% return.


DOGG

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.22%
YTD
5.09%
6M
4.26%
1Y
15.85%
3Y*
11.91%
5Y*
10Y*

ELCV

1D
0.48%
1M
4.35%
YTD
21.38%
6M
20.08%
1Y
30.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DOGG vs. ELCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DOGG
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF
5.09%19.43%-6.68%
ELCV
Eventide High Dividend ETF
21.38%9.96%-1.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DOGG and ELCV is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DOGG vs. ELCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DOGG
DOGG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
DOGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOGG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DOGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

ELCV
ELCV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ELCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELCV Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ELCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELCV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DOGG vs. ELCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) and Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DOGGELCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.48

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

6.15

-4.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.53

21.81

-17.28

DOGG vs. ELCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DOGG Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the ELCV Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOGG and ELCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DOGGELCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

2.71

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

1.15

-0.31

Drawdowns

DOGG vs. ELCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOGG drawdown since its inception was -11.19%, smaller than the maximum ELCV drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOGG and ELCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DOGGELCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.19%

-18.38%

+7.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-5.05%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.62%

0.00%

-7.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-3.75%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

1.43%

+2.07%

Volatility

DOGG vs. ELCV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) is 3.20%, while Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that DOGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ELCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DOGGELCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

3.61%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.04%

8.75%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.43%

11.47%

-1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.97%

15.38%

-2.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.97%

15.38%

-2.41%

DOGG vs. ELCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DOGG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ELCV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

DOGG vs. ELCV - Dividend Comparison

DOGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.90%, more than ELCV's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DOGG
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF
8.90%8.75%9.92%5.89%
ELCV
Eventide High Dividend ETF
1.76%2.34%0.29%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DOGG and ELCV have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ELCV has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to DOGG (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOGG dropped -11.19% vs ELCV's -18.38%.

On 1-year performance, ELCV leads with 30.91% vs 15.85% for DOGG. On fees, ELCV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DOGG has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ELCV has performed better with a 30.91% return vs 15.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ELCV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DOGG.

DOGG has the higher dividend yield at 8.90%, compared with 1.76% for ELCV.

DOGG is categorized as Derivative Income, while ELCV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Eventide. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DOGG and 0.49% for ELCV.

ELCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DOGG and ELCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer