DOGG vs. ARMW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DOGG (FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DOGG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.

Performance

DOGG vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOGG achieves a 5.09% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 363.23% return.

DOGG

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 5.09%
• 6M: 4.26%
• 1Y: 15.85%
• 3Y*: 11.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMW

• 1D: 3.44%
• 1M: 128.75%
• YTD: 363.23%
• 6M: 245.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DOGG vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF	5.09%	5.33%
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	363.23%	-40.49%

Correlation

The correlation between DOGG and ARMW is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025	0.02

DOGG vs. ARMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DOGG	ARMW
Consumer Cyclical	30.1%	-
Healthcare	29.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	19.9%	-
Communication Services	10.2%	-
Energy	10.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	36.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

DOGG vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DOGG

DOGG Risk / Return Rank: 40
DOGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
DOGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
DOGG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
DOGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
DOGG Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DOGG vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DOGG	ARMW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.53	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DOGG	ARMW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	4.96	-4.11

Drawdowns

DOGG vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOGG drawdown since its inception was -11.19%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOGG and ARMW.

Drawdown Indicators

	DOGG	ARMW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.19%	-48.47%	+37.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.62%	0.00%	-7.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.22%	-26.55%	+23.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DOGG	ARMW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.20%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.04%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.43%	88.46%	-78.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.97%	88.46%	-75.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.97%	88.46%	-75.49%

DOGG vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DOGG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

DOGG vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

DOGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.90%, less than ARMW's 15.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	15.20%	16.38%	0.00%	0.00%
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF	8.90%	8.75%	9.92%	5.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DOGG and ARMW in my portfolio?

DOGG and ARMW have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DOGG or ARMW?

On fees, DOGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DOGG or ARMW?

DOGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DOGG or ARMW?

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 15.20%, compared with 8.90% for DOGG.

What is the main difference between DOGG and ARMW?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DOGG and 0.99% for ARMW.