DNOPY vs. NGD.TO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

DNOPY (Dino Polska S.A) and NGD.TO (New Gold Inc.) are both stocks. DNOPY operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive), while NGD.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials). At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DNOPY vs. NGD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dino Polska S.A (DNOPY) and New Gold Inc. (NGD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

DNOPY is traded in USD, while NGD.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the NGD.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

DNOPY

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -2.29%
• YTD: -30.21%
• 6M: -27.27%
• 1Y: -40.59%
• 3Y*: -11.34%
• 5Y*: 4.36%
• 10Y*: —

NGD.TO

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNOPY vs. NGD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DNOPY Dino Polska S.A	-30.21%	19.79%	-16.65%	30.68%	2.43%	10.75%	89.61%
NGD.TO New Gold Inc.	1.41%	249.08%	72.38%	47.88%	-33.82%	-32.47%	160.22%

Correlation

The correlation between DNOPY and NGD.TO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2020	0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap DNOPY : $7.95B NGD.TO : CA$9.63B
EPS DNOPY : PLN 1.59 NGD.TO : $1.09
PE Ratio DNOPY : 18.78 NGD.TO : 7.99
PEG Ratio DNOPY : 1.07 NGD.TO : 0.01
PS Ratio DNOPY : 0.85 NGD.TO : 4.65
PB Ratio DNOPY : 3.26 NGD.TO : 3.61
Total Revenue (TTM) DNOPY : PLN 34.60B NGD.TO : $1.49B
Gross Profit (TTM) DNOPY : PLN 8.12B NGD.TO : $767.09M
EBITDA (TTM) DNOPY : PLN 2.57B NGD.TO : $810.05M

Return for Risk

DNOPY vs. NGD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNOPY

DNOPY Risk / Return Rank: 7
DNOPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
DNOPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
DNOPY Omega Ratio Rank: 8
DNOPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
DNOPY Martin Ratio Rank: 5

NGD.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNOPY vs. NGD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dino Polska S.A (DNOPY) and New Gold Inc. (NGD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DNOPY	NGD.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.96	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.34	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.87	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.55	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	DNOPY	NGD.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.50%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.46%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.94%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DNOPY	NGD.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.78%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.91%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.59%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.31%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.67%	—	—

Dividends

DNOPY vs. NGD.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither DNOPY nor NGD.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DNOPY and NGD.TO in my portfolio?

DNOPY and NGD.TO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.