DNNG vs. ADBG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DNNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long DNN Daily ETF) and ADBG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. DNNG is passively managed, while ADBG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

DNNG vs. ADBG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long DNN Daily ETF (DNNG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DNNG

• 1D: -6.12%
• 1M: -9.26%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ADBG

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: -37.89%
• YTD: -72.90%
• 6M: -73.44%
• 1Y: -79.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNNG vs. ADBG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DNNG Leverage Shares 2X Long DNN Daily ETF	-48.80%
ADBG Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF	-51.83%

Correlation

The correlation between DNNG and ADBG is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026	-0.13

Return for Risk

DNNG vs. ADBG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNNG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ADBG

ADBG Risk / Return Rank: 0
ADBG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
ADBG Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
ADBG Omega Ratio Rank: 0
ADBG Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
ADBG Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNNG vs. ADBG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long DNN Daily ETF (DNNG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DNNG	ADBG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-1.15	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-2.44	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.71	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.98	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.68	—

Drawdowns

DNNG vs. ADBG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNNG drawdown since its inception was -65.39%, smaller than the maximum ADBG drawdown of -83.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNNG and ADBG.

Drawdown Indicators

	DNNG	ADBG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.39%	-83.90%	+18.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-80.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.29%	-83.54%	+26.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.10%	-43.18%	+9.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	47.37%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DNNG	ADBG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	32.23%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	59.28%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	118.09%	69.21%	+48.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	118.09%	68.63%	+49.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	118.09%	68.63%	+49.46%

DNNG vs. ADBG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DNNG and ADBG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

DNNG vs. ADBG - Dividend Comparison

Neither DNNG nor ADBG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DNNG and ADBG in my portfolio?

DNNG and ADBG have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DNNG or ADBG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DNNG or ADBG?

DNNG and ADBG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DNNG or ADBG?

DNNG and ADBG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.