DNLDX vs. FZFLX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) and Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund (FZFLX).
DNLDX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Jan 29, 1985. FZFLX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 12, 2015.
Performance
DNLDX vs. FZFLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DNLDX vs. FZFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund | -1.64% | 9.79% | 22.27% | 16.99% | -14.34% | 26.49% | 9.29% | 16.82% | -14.46% | 16.64% |
FZFLX Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund | 7.81% | 10.76% | 15.52% | 17.75% | -15.62% | 20.40% | 19.78% | 31.96% | -9.25% | 18.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DNLDX achieves a -1.64% return, which is significantly lower than FZFLX's 7.81% return. Over the past 10 years, DNLDX has underperformed FZFLX with an annualized return of 8.68%, while FZFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.08% annualized return.
DNLDX
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -6.82%
- YTD
- -1.64%
- 6M
- -0.63%
- 1Y
- 13.61%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 8.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.68%
FZFLX
- 1D
- 5.00%
- 1M
- -6.21%
- YTD
- 7.81%
- 6M
- 9.60%
- 1Y
- 26.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.05%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DNLDX vs. FZFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DNLDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FZFLX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DNLDX vs. FZFLX — Risk / Return Rank
DNLDX
FZFLX
DNLDX vs. FZFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) and Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund (FZFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DNLDX | FZFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.78 | 1.13 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 1.66 | -0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.23 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 1.73 | -0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.86 | 7.43 | -3.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DNLDX | FZFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 1.13 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.40 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.58 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between DNLDX and FZFLX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DNLDX vs. FZFLX - Dividend Comparison
DNLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.27%, less than FZFLX's 53.58% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNLDX BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund | 15.27% | 14.15% | 15.24% | 1.69% | 8.82% | 17.74% | 2.77% | 2.65% | 11.14% | 11.32% | 1.00% | 3.12% |
FZFLX Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund | 53.58% | 57.77% | 10.20% | 2.35% | 79.79% | 50.77% | 7.19% | 6.49% | 7.69% | 1.68% | 0.93% | 0.67% |
Drawdowns
DNLDX vs. FZFLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DNLDX drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, which is greater than FZFLX's maximum drawdown of -42.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNLDX and FZFLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DNLDX | FZFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.69% | -42.03% | -21.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.37% | -14.54% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.42% | -24.77% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.23% | -42.03% | -0.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.29% | -6.21% | -1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.67% | -5.81% | -3.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 3.38% | -0.64% |
Volatility
DNLDX vs. FZFLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) is 4.43%, while Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund (FZFLX) has a volatility of 11.32%. This indicates that DNLDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DNLDX | FZFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 11.32% | -6.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.81% | 16.31% | -6.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.89% | 24.32% | -5.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 20.78% | -2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.49% | 20.91% | -1.42% |