PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DNLDX vs. DISSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DNLDX vs. DISSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) and BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund (DISSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNLDX achieves a 11.73% return, which is significantly lower than DISSX's 16.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DNLDX having a 10.01% annualized return and DISSX not far ahead at 10.07%.


DNLDX

1D
0.43%
1M
3.72%
YTD
11.73%
6M
12.09%
1Y
21.00%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
10.01%

DISSX

1D
0.90%
1M
2.55%
YTD
16.16%
6M
14.84%
1Y
32.05%
3Y*
13.35%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*
10.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNLDX vs. DISSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
11.73%9.79%22.27%16.99%-14.34%26.49%9.29%16.82%-14.46%16.64%
DISSX
BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund
16.16%5.41%6.87%14.24%-16.71%26.41%10.92%22.28%-8.30%12.40%

Correlation

The correlation between DNLDX and DISSX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1997

0.91

The correlation between DNLDX and DISSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DNLDX vs. DISSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNLDX
DNLDX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DNLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
DNLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

DISSX
DISSX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
DISSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DISSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DISSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DISSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DISSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNLDX vs. DISSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) and BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund (DISSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DNLDXDISSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.34

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

3.93

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.45

13.11

-1.66

DNLDX vs. DISSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNLDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the DISSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNLDX and DISSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DNLDXDISSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

1.96

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.23

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.44

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.41

+0.14

Drawdowns

DNLDX vs. DISSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNLDX drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, which is greater than DISSX's maximum drawdown of -58.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNLDX and DISSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DNLDXDISSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.69%

-58.30%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-8.75%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.42%

-29.02%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.42%

-29.02%

+5.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.23%

-44.45%

+2.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.04%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-9.57%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

2.62%

-0.68%

Volatility

DNLDX vs. DISSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) is 3.36%, while BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund (DISSX) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that DNLDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DISSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DNLDXDISSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

4.49%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.55%

11.73%

-2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.10%

17.58%

-4.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.48%

21.49%

-3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.51%

23.17%

-3.66%

DNLDX vs. DISSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DNLDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than DISSX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DNLDX vs. DISSX - Dividend Comparison

DNLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.45%, more than DISSX's 13.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DISSX
BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund
13.28%15.42%14.79%8.20%13.87%10.72%7.61%8.35%13.18%7.40%6.49%11.30%
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
13.45%14.15%15.24%1.69%8.82%17.74%2.77%2.65%11.14%11.32%1.00%3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, DNLDX and DISSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DISSX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to DNLDX (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNLDX dropped -63.69% vs DISSX's -58.30%.

DISSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DNLDX and DISSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer