PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DNLDX vs. ATGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DNLDX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DNLDX

1D
0.43%
1M
3.72%
YTD
11.73%
6M
12.09%
1Y
21.00%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
10.01%

ATGAX

1D
1.15%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNLDX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DNLDX and ATGAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DNLDX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNLDX
DNLDX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DNLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
DNLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

ATGAX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNLDX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DNLDXATGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.45

DNLDX vs. ATGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DNLDXATGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

58.33

-57.78

Drawdowns

DNLDX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNLDX drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNLDX and ATGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DNLDXATGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.69%

0.00%

-63.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

0.00%

-9.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

Volatility

DNLDX vs. ATGAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DNLDXATGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.10%

9.26%

+3.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.48%

9.26%

+9.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.51%

9.26%

+10.25%

DNLDX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DNLDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DNLDX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison

DNLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.45%, while ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATGAX
Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
13.45%14.15%15.24%1.69%8.82%17.74%2.77%2.65%11.14%11.32%1.00%3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, DNLDX and ATGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DNLDX and ATGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer