DMX vs. SIFI
DMX (DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF) and SIFI (Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DMX returned 6.47% vs 7.30% for SIFI. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
DMX vs. SIFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMX achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly higher than SIFI's 1.12% return.
DMX
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 6.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIFI
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- 7.30%
- 3Y*
- 7.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DMX vs. SIFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DMX DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF | 1.46% | 7.23% | -0.04% |
SIFI Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF | 1.12% | 8.83% | -0.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between DMX and SIFI is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024 | 0.66 |
The correlation between DMX and SIFI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DMX vs. SIFI — Risk / Return Rank
DMX
SIFI
DMX vs. SIFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF (DMX) and Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF (SIFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DMX | SIFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.42 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.06 | 2.70 | +2.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.23 | 11.05 | +10.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DMX | SIFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.83 | 2.16 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.85 | 0.47 | +1.38 |
Drawdowns
DMX vs. SIFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMX drawdown since its inception was -2.65%, smaller than the maximum SIFI drawdown of -14.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMX and SIFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMX | SIFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.65% | -14.68% | +12.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.28% | -2.71% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.20% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -4.82% | +4.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.31% | 0.66% | -0.35% |
Volatility
DMX vs. SIFI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF (DMX) is 0.87%, while Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF (SIFI) has a volatility of 1.02%. This indicates that DMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DMX | SIFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.87% | 1.02% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.69% | 2.47% | -0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30% | 3.39% | -1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.14% | 4.93% | -1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.14% | 4.93% | -1.79% |
DMX vs. SIFI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DMX and SIFI have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
DMX vs. SIFI - Dividend Comparison
DMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, less than SIFI's 6.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMX DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF | 5.90% | 5.96% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIFI Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF | 6.45% | 6.57% | 5.87% | 5.71% | 3.88% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DMX and SIFI have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIFI has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to DMX (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMX dropped -2.65% vs SIFI's -14.68%.
On 1-year performance, SIFI leads with 7.30% vs 6.47% for DMX. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, DMX has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SIFI has performed better with a 7.30% return vs 6.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DMX and SIFI have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
SIFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.45%, compared with 5.90% for DMX.
They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and Harbor.
DMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DMX and SIFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer