DMX vs. DCMB
DMX (DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF) and DCMB (Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DMX is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by DoubleLine, while DCMB is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by DoubleLine. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DMX returned 6.47% vs 4.74% for DCMB. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DMX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for DCMB.
Performance
DMX vs. DCMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DMX having a 1.46% return and DCMB slightly lower at 1.39%.
DMX
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 6.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DCMB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 4.74%
- 3Y*
- 6.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DMX vs. DCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DMX DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF | 1.46% | 7.23% | -0.04% |
DCMB Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF | 1.39% | 5.86% | 0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between DMX and DCMB is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DMX vs. DCMB — Risk / Return Rank
DMX
DCMB
DMX vs. DCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF (DMX) and Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DMX | DCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.83 | 4.16 | -1.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.51 | 7.17 | -2.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.96 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.06 | 6.98 | -1.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.23 | 25.78 | -4.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DMX | DCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.83 | 4.16 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.85 | 3.90 | -2.05 |
Drawdowns
DMX vs. DCMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMX drawdown since its inception was -2.65%, which is greater than DCMB's maximum drawdown of -0.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMX and DCMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMX | DCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.65% | -0.84% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.28% | -0.68% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.20% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -0.11% | -0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.31% | 0.18% | +0.13% |
Volatility
DMX vs. DCMB - Volatility Comparison
DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF (DMX) has a higher volatility of 0.87% compared to Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCMB) at 0.47%. This indicates that DMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DCMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DMX | DCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.87% | 0.47% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.69% | 0.88% | +0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30% | 1.14% | +1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.14% | 1.58% | +1.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.14% | 1.58% | +1.56% |
DMX vs. DCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DCMB's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DMX vs. DCMB - Dividend Comparison
DMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, more than DCMB's 4.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DCMB Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF | 4.75% | 4.84% | 5.52% | 3.47% |
DMX DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF | 5.90% | 5.96% | 0.42% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DMX and DCMB have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DMX has higher volatility (0.87%) compared to DCMB (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMX dropped -2.65% vs DCMB's -0.84%.
On 1-year performance, DMX leads with 6.47% vs 4.74% for DCMB. On fees, DCMB is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DCMB has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DMX has performed better with a 6.47% return vs 4.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DCMB is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DMX.
DMX has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 4.75% for DCMB.
DMX is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while DCMB is Short-Term Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DMX and 0.40% for DCMB.
DCMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.16 vs 2.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DMX and DCMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer