PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMCRX vs. PCSGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMCRX vs. PCSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) and PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments (PCSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMCRX achieves a 25.20% return, which is significantly higher than PCSGX's 13.18% return. Over the past 10 years, DMCRX has outperformed PCSGX with an annualized return of 22.49%, while PCSGX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.06% annualized return.


DMCRX

1D
0.10%
1M
5.08%
YTD
25.20%
6M
31.61%
1Y
81.24%
3Y*
30.42%
5Y*
10.86%
10Y*
22.49%

PCSGX

1D
0.43%
1M
5.20%
YTD
13.18%
6M
13.56%
1Y
23.80%
3Y*
11.67%
5Y*
2.86%
10Y*
11.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMCRX vs. PCSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DMCRX
Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund
25.20%31.17%30.58%11.47%-33.54%22.23%86.43%34.03%2.52%24.35%
PCSGX
PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments
13.18%2.00%12.20%15.89%-26.58%14.91%38.85%24.05%0.33%23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between DMCRX and PCSGX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2013

0.89

The correlation between DMCRX and PCSGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMCRX vs. PCSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMCRX
DMCRX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DMCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
DMCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

PCSGX
PCSGX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
PCSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PCSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMCRX vs. PCSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) and PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments (PCSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMCRXPCSGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.97

1.34

+1.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.46

2.05

+1.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.23

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.29

2.12

+3.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.84

7.87

+10.97

DMCRX vs. PCSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMCRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is higher than the PCSGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMCRX and PCSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMCRXPCSGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97

1.34

+1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.13

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.49

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.44

+0.15

Drawdowns

DMCRX vs. PCSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMCRX drawdown since its inception was -59.16%, which is greater than PCSGX's maximum drawdown of -56.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMCRX and PCSGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMCRXPCSGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.16%

-56.32%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.46%

-13.48%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.92%

-27.64%

-7.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.16%

-37.48%

-21.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.16%

-39.35%

-19.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

0.00%

-1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.11%

-12.41%

-7.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

3.63%

+0.71%

Volatility

DMCRX vs. PCSGX - Volatility Comparison

Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) has a higher volatility of 8.30% compared to PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments (PCSGX) at 4.85%. This indicates that DMCRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMCRXPCSGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.30%

4.85%

+3.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.11%

14.98%

+6.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.52%

19.56%

+8.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.48%

22.85%

+16.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.98%

22.84%

+11.14%

DMCRX vs. PCSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMCRX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than PCSGX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMCRX vs. PCSGX - Dividend Comparison

DMCRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.96%, more than PCSGX's 5.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DMCRX
Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund
10.96%13.72%3.86%0.87%8.20%48.23%19.79%14.70%33.22%8.91%0.00%4.20%
PCSGX
PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments
5.66%6.40%3.06%0.00%0.00%45.92%6.50%15.70%20.15%5.56%0.00%25.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


DMCRX and PCSGX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DMCRX has higher volatility (8.30%) compared to PCSGX (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMCRX dropped -59.16% vs PCSGX's -56.32%.

DMCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMCRX and PCSGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer