PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMCRX vs. NPSGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMCRX vs. NPSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) and Nicholas Partners Small Cap Growth Fund (NPSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DMCRX having a 25.20% return and NPSGX slightly higher at 25.28%.


DMCRX

1D
0.10%
1M
5.08%
YTD
25.20%
6M
31.61%
1Y
81.24%
3Y*
30.42%
5Y*
10.86%
10Y*
22.49%

NPSGX

1D
-1.58%
1M
4.62%
YTD
25.28%
6M
27.44%
1Y
62.30%
3Y*
25.60%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMCRX vs. NPSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DMCRX
Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund
25.20%31.17%30.58%11.47%-33.54%22.23%86.43%22.96%
NPSGX
Nicholas Partners Small Cap Growth Fund
25.28%17.88%20.83%20.05%-31.62%10.52%69.72%22.14%

Correlation

The correlation between DMCRX and NPSGX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2019

0.92

The correlation between DMCRX and NPSGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMCRX vs. NPSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMCRX
DMCRX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DMCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
DMCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

NPSGX
NPSGX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NPSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
NPSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMCRX vs. NPSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) and Nicholas Partners Small Cap Growth Fund (NPSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMCRXNPSGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.97

2.63

+0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.46

3.31

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.42

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.29

4.72

+0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.84

17.54

+1.31

DMCRX vs. NPSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMCRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is comparable to the NPSGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMCRX and NPSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMCRXNPSGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97

2.63

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.33

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.63

-0.04

Drawdowns

DMCRX vs. NPSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMCRX drawdown since its inception was -59.16%, which is greater than NPSGX's maximum drawdown of -46.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMCRX and NPSGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMCRXNPSGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.16%

-46.95%

-12.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.46%

-13.45%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.92%

-28.03%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.16%

-46.95%

-12.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-2.27%

+0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.11%

-17.92%

-2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

3.62%

+0.72%

Volatility

DMCRX vs. NPSGX - Volatility Comparison

Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) and Nicholas Partners Small Cap Growth Fund (NPSGX) have volatilities of 8.30% and 8.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMCRXNPSGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.30%

8.49%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.11%

19.61%

+1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.52%

24.24%

+4.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.48%

28.06%

+11.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.98%

28.66%

+5.32%

DMCRX vs. NPSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMCRX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than NPSGX's 1.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMCRX vs. NPSGX - Dividend Comparison

DMCRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.96%, more than NPSGX's 3.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DMCRX
Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund
10.96%13.72%3.86%0.87%8.20%48.23%19.79%14.70%33.22%8.91%0.00%4.20%
NPSGX
Nicholas Partners Small Cap Growth Fund
3.60%4.50%5.89%0.00%0.00%21.28%9.50%3.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, DMCRX and NPSGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NPSGX has higher volatility (8.49%) compared to DMCRX (8.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMCRX dropped -59.16% vs NPSGX's -46.95%.

DMCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMCRX and NPSGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer