DMAY vs. FDVV
DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - DMAY tracks the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index while FDVV tracks the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DMAY returned 7.16%/yr vs 13.36%/yr for FDVV. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DMAY charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.
Performance
DMAY vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMAY achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly lower than FDVV's 8.39% return.
DMAY
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 4.42%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 12.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- —
FDVV
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 8.39%
- 6M
- 8.67%
- 1Y
- 23.45%
- 3Y*
- 20.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.36%
- 10Y*
- —
DMAY vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 4.42% | 11.05% | 12.82% | 15.40% | -9.98% | 6.14% | 6.40% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 8.39% | 17.08% | 21.81% | 18.00% | -4.21% | 29.24% | 27.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between DMAY and FDVV is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020 | 0.80 |
The correlation between DMAY and FDVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
DMAY vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DMAY
FDVV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
DMAY
FDVV
Financial Services
DMAY
FDVV
Communication Services
DMAY
FDVV
Consumer Cyclical
DMAY
FDVV
Healthcare
DMAY
FDVV
Industrials
DMAY
FDVV
Consumer Defensive
DMAY
FDVV
Energy
DMAY
FDVV
-
Utilities
DMAY
FDVV
Real Estate
DMAY
FDVV
Basic Materials
DMAY
FDVV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DMAY vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank
DMAY
FDVV
DMAY vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DMAY | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.43 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.73 | 2.53 | +1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.76 | 10.54 | +12.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DMAY | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | 2.35 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.91 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.79 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
DMAY vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.90%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAY and FDVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMAY | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.90% | -40.25% | +26.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.36% | -9.30% | +5.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.38% | -15.90% | +3.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.90% | -20.18% | +6.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -1.12% | +0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -3.81% | +1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | 2.23% | -1.68% |
Volatility
DMAY vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) is 0.84%, while Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that DMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DMAY | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 3.14% | -2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.74% | 7.99% | -4.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.73% | 10.06% | -5.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.02% | 14.75% | -5.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.43% | 17.00% | -8.57% |
DMAY vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMAY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DMAY vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison
DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 2.72% | 2.89% | 2.94% | 3.77% | 3.44% | 2.70% | 3.19% | 3.93% | 4.05% | 3.66% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DMAY and FDVV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDVV has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to DMAY (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMAY dropped -13.90% vs FDVV's -40.25%.
On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.36% vs 7.16% for DMAY. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.36% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.
FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.
DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DMAY and 0.29% for FDVV.
DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DMAY and FDVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer