PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMAY vs. FDVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMAY vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMAY achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly lower than FDVV's 8.39% return.


DMAY

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.30%
YTD
4.42%
6M
5.19%
1Y
12.37%
3Y*
11.96%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*

FDVV

1D
-1.12%
1M
4.44%
YTD
8.39%
6M
8.67%
1Y
23.45%
3Y*
20.08%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMAY vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May
4.42%11.05%12.82%15.40%-9.98%6.14%6.40%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
8.39%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%29.24%27.98%

Correlation

The correlation between DMAY and FDVV is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020

0.80

The correlation between DMAY and FDVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

DMAY vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DMAY
FDVV

Technology

36.2%
29.1%

Financial Services

11.9%
17.0%

Communication Services

10.9%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
13.6%

Healthcare

8.4%
3.1%

Industrials

8.1%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
11.0%

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.3%
8.7%

Real Estate

1.9%
10.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

DMAY
36.2%
FDVV
29.1%

Financial Services

DMAY
11.9%
FDVV
17.0%

Communication Services

DMAY
10.9%
FDVV
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DMAY
10.1%
FDVV
13.6%

Healthcare

DMAY
8.4%
FDVV
3.1%

Industrials

DMAY
8.1%
FDVV
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

DMAY
4.9%
FDVV
11.0%

Energy

DMAY
3.5%
FDVV

-

Utilities

DMAY
2.3%
FDVV
8.7%

Real Estate

DMAY
1.9%
FDVV
10.1%

Basic Materials

DMAY
1.8%
FDVV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMAY vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMAY
DMAY Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMAY vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMAYFDVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.43

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.73

2.53

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.76

10.54

+12.22

DMAY vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMAY and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMAYFDVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

2.35

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.91

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.79

+0.08

Drawdowns

DMAY vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.90%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAY and FDVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMAYFDVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.90%

-40.25%

+26.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.36%

-9.30%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.38%

-15.90%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.90%

-20.18%

+6.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-1.12%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.24%

-3.81%

+1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

2.23%

-1.68%

Volatility

DMAY vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) is 0.84%, while Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that DMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMAYFDVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

3.14%

-2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.74%

7.99%

-4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.73%

10.06%

-5.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.02%

14.75%

-5.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.43%

17.00%

-8.57%

DMAY vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMAY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMAY vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
2.72%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


DMAY and FDVV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDVV has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to DMAY (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMAY dropped -13.90% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.36% vs 7.16% for DMAY. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.36% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.

FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.

DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DMAY and 0.29% for FDVV.

DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMAY and FDVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer