DMAX vs. FNOV

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

DMAX (iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF) and FNOV (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November) are both Defined Outcome funds - DMAX tracks the S&P 500 Index while FNOV tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DMAX returned 7.16% vs 16.29% for FNOV. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DMAX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FNOV.

Performance

DMAX vs. FNOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November (FNOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMAX achieves a 2.77% return, which is significantly lower than FNOV's 6.99% return.

DMAX

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.44%
• 6M: 2.62%
• YTD: 2.77%
• 1Y: 7.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNOV

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 1.15%
• 6M: 5.75%
• YTD: 6.99%
• 1Y: 16.29%
• 3Y*: 12.96%
• 5Y*: 9.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMAX vs. FNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF	2.77%	7.51%
FNOV FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November	6.99%	14.66%

Correlation

The correlation between DMAX and FNOV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025	0.85

The correlation between DMAX and FNOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DMAX vs. FNOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMAX

DMAX Risk / Return Rank: 95
DMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
DMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
DMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
DMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
DMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

FNOV

FNOV Risk / Return Rank: 84
FNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMAX vs. FNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November (FNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DMAX	FNOV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.14	2.16	+0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.77	3.14	+1.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	1.42	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.09	2.87	+2.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.13	14.87	+10.26

DMAX vs. FNOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is higher than the FNOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMAX and FNOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DMAX vs. FNOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMAX drawdown since its inception was -3.37%, smaller than the maximum FNOV drawdown of -24.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAX and FNOV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DMAX	FNOV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.37%	-24.41%	+21.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.41%	-5.71%	+4.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.11%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-0.31%	+0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.37%	-2.88%	+2.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.29%	1.10%	-0.81%

Volatility

DMAX vs. FNOV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) is 0.63%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November (FNOV) has a volatility of 2.27%. This indicates that DMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DMAX	FNOV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.63%	2.27%	-1.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.65%	6.10%	-4.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29%	7.58%	-5.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.33%	11.53%	-8.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.33%	13.60%	-10.27%

DMAX vs. FNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMAX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FNOV's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

DMAX vs. FNOV - Dividend Comparison

DMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, while FNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
DMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF	1.15%	1.18%
FNOV FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DMAX and FNOV in my portfolio?

DMAX and FNOV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DMAX or FNOV?

FNOV has higher volatility (2.27%) compared to DMAX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMAX dropped -3.37% vs FNOV's -24.41%.

Which ETF is better, DMAX or FNOV?

On 1-year performance, FNOV leads with 16.29% vs 7.16% for DMAX. On fees, DMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DMAX has been the lower-risk option at 0.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DMAX or FNOV?

Over the 1-year period, FNOV has performed better with a 16.29% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DMAX or FNOV?

DMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FNOV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DMAX or FNOV?

DMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.00% for FNOV.

What is the main difference between DMAX and FNOV?

DMAX tracks S&P 500 Index, while FNOV tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: iShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DMAX and 0.85% for FNOV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.