PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMAR vs. XDOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMAR vs. XDOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October (XDOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DMAR

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.43%
YTD
7.21%
6M
8.16%
1Y
14.75%
3Y*
12.11%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*

XDOC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMAR vs. XDOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


DMAR vs. XDOC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DMAR
XDOC

Technology

36.2%
35.4%

Financial Services

11.9%
13.3%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.7%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.7%

Industrials

8.1%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.0%

Utilities

2.3%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.6%

Technology

DMAR
36.2%
XDOC
35.4%

Financial Services

DMAR
11.9%
XDOC
13.3%

Communication Services

DMAR
10.9%
XDOC
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DMAR
10.1%
XDOC
10.7%

Healthcare

DMAR
8.4%
XDOC
8.7%

Industrials

DMAR
8.1%
XDOC
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

DMAR
4.9%
XDOC
4.9%

Energy

DMAR
3.5%
XDOC
3.0%

Utilities

DMAR
2.3%
XDOC
2.4%

Real Estate

DMAR
1.9%
XDOC
1.9%

Basic Materials

DMAR
1.8%
XDOC
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMAR vs. XDOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMAR
DMAR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
DMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

XDOC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMAR vs. XDOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October (XDOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMARXDOCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

62.37

DMAR vs. XDOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMARXDOCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

Drawdowns

DMAR vs. XDOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMAR drawdown since its inception was -9.84%, which is greater than XDOC's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAR and XDOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMARXDOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.84%

0.00%

-9.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

0.00%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

0.00%

-1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.24%

Volatility

DMAR vs. XDOC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMARXDOCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.64%

0.00%

+3.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.04%

0.00%

+7.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.97%

0.00%

+6.97%

DMAR vs. XDOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XDOC's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMAR vs. XDOC - Dividend Comparison

Neither DMAR nor XDOC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, XDOC is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDOC is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAR.

DMAR and XDOC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DMAR and 0.79% for XDOC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMAR and XDOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer