DMAR vs. RDVI
DMAR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March) and RDVI (FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DMAR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while RDVI is a Derivative Income fund tracking the NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers. DMAR is actively managed, while RDVI is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DMAR returned 12.11%/yr vs 18.62%/yr for RDVI. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DMAR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RDVI.
Performance
DMAR vs. RDVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMAR achieves a 7.21% return, which is significantly lower than RDVI's 9.43% return.
DMAR
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 7.21%
- 6M
- 8.16%
- 1Y
- 14.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- —
RDVI
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- 9.43%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 24.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DMAR vs. RDVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March | 7.21% | 9.13% | 12.74% | 12.25% | 1.72% |
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 9.43% | 17.93% | 14.56% | 18.63% | 9.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between DMAR and RDVI is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2022 | 0.69 |
The correlation between DMAR and RDVI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
DMAR vs. RDVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DMAR
RDVI
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
DMAR
RDVI
Financial Services
DMAR
RDVI
Communication Services
DMAR
RDVI
Consumer Cyclical
DMAR
RDVI
Healthcare
DMAR
RDVI
Industrials
DMAR
RDVI
Consumer Defensive
DMAR
RDVI
Energy
DMAR
RDVI
Utilities
DMAR
RDVI
Real Estate
DMAR
RDVI
-
Basic Materials
DMAR
RDVI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DMAR vs. RDVI — Risk / Return Rank
DMAR
RDVI
DMAR vs. RDVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) and FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DMAR | RDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.04 | 1.34 | +0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.68 | 2.96 | +6.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 62.37 | 12.48 | +49.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DMAR | RDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.07 | 1.89 | +2.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 1.19 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
DMAR vs. RDVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMAR drawdown since its inception was -9.84%, smaller than the maximum RDVI drawdown of -18.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAR and RDVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMAR | RDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.84% | -18.35% | +8.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.53% | -8.48% | +6.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.16% | -18.35% | +9.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.43% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -3.17% | +1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.24% | 2.01% | -1.77% |
Volatility
DMAR vs. RDVI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) is 0.67%, while FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that DMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DMAR | RDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | 3.66% | -2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.74% | 10.50% | -7.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.64% | 13.27% | -9.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.04% | 16.91% | -9.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.97% | 16.91% | -9.94% |
DMAR vs. RDVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DMAR vs. RDVI - Dividend Comparison
DMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RDVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 7.94% | 8.10% | 8.62% | 8.45% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DMAR and RDVI have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDVI has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to DMAR (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMAR dropped -9.84% vs RDVI's -18.35%.
On 3-year performance, RDVI leads with 18.62% vs 12.11% for DMAR. On fees, RDVI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DMAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RDVI has performed better with a 18.62% return vs 12.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDVI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAR.
RDVI has the higher dividend yield at 7.94%, compared with 0.00% for DMAR.
DMAR is categorized as Options Trading, while RDVI is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DMAR and 0.75% for RDVI.
DMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.07 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DMAR and RDVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer