DMAR vs. IVVM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DMAR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March) and IVVM (iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DMAR returned 14.75% vs 16.27% for IVVM. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DMAR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IVVM.

Performance

DMAR vs. IVVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) and iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMAR achieves a 7.21% return, which is significantly higher than IVVM's 5.95% return.

DMAR

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.43%
• YTD: 7.21%
• 6M: 8.16%
• 1Y: 14.75%
• 3Y*: 12.11%
• 5Y*: 7.74%
• 10Y*: —

IVVM

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 1.95%
• YTD: 5.95%
• 6M: 6.15%
• 1Y: 16.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMAR vs. IVVM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March	7.21%	9.13%	12.74%	4.88%
IVVM iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF	5.95%	14.24%	16.08%	5.17%

Correlation

The correlation between DMAR and IVVM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2023	0.86

The correlation between DMAR and IVVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

DMAR vs. IVVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DMAR	IVVM
Technology	36.2%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	8.1%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

DMAR vs. IVVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMAR

DMAR Risk / Return Rank: 97
DMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
DMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
DMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
DMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
DMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

IVVM

IVVM Risk / Return Rank: 72
IVVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
IVVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
IVVM Omega Ratio Rank: 79
IVVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
IVVM Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMAR vs. IVVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) and iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DMAR	IVVM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.07	2.32	+1.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	7.00	3.33	+3.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.04	1.48	+0.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.68	3.08	+6.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	62.37	15.34	+47.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DMAR vs. IVVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMAR Sharpe Ratio is 4.07, which is higher than the IVVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMAR and IVVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DMAR	IVVM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.07	2.32	+1.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.17	1.49	-0.33

Drawdowns

DMAR vs. IVVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMAR drawdown since its inception was -9.84%, smaller than the maximum IVVM drawdown of -11.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAR and IVVM.

Drawdown Indicators

	DMAR	IVVM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.84%	-11.62%	+1.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.53%	-5.31%	+3.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.16%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-0.22%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-0.92%	-0.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.24%	1.06%	-0.82%

Volatility

DMAR vs. IVVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) is 0.67%, while iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM) has a volatility of 0.76%. This indicates that DMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DMAR	IVVM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.67%	0.76%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.74%	5.62%	-2.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.64%	7.04%	-3.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.04%	9.62%	-2.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.97%	9.62%	-2.65%

DMAR vs. IVVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DMAR vs. IVVM - Dividend Comparison

DMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IVVM iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF	0.65%	0.68%	0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DMAR and IVVM in my portfolio?

DMAR and IVVM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DMAR or IVVM?

IVVM has higher volatility (0.76%) compared to DMAR (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMAR dropped -9.84% vs IVVM's -11.62%.

Which ETF is better, DMAR or IVVM?

On 1-year performance, IVVM leads with 16.27% vs 14.75% for DMAR. On fees, IVVM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DMAR or IVVM?

Over the 1-year period, IVVM has performed better with a 16.27% return vs 14.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DMAR or IVVM?

IVVM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DMAR or IVVM?

IVVM has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for DMAR.

What is the main difference between DMAR and IVVM?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DMAR and 0.50% for IVVM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.07 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.