PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMAC vs. LOOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DMAC vs. LOOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DiaMedica Therapeutics Inc. (DMAC) and Loop Industries, Inc. (LOOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMAC achieves a -29.02% return, which is significantly lower than LOOP's 30.00% return.


DMAC

1D
-2.08%
1M
-6.61%
YTD
-29.02%
6M
-33.61%
1Y
37.14%
3Y*
29.53%
5Y*
-5.28%
10Y*
5.21%

LOOP

1D
-6.47%
1M
-5.11%
YTD
30.00%
6M
21.50%
1Y
4.00%
3Y*
-24.58%
5Y*
-35.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMAC vs. LOOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DMAC
DiaMedica Therapeutics Inc.
-29.02%46.59%91.20%79.74%-57.64%-63.21%109.07%66.67%-41.80%-11.75%
LOOP
Loop Industries, Inc.
30.00%-16.67%-68.25%58.16%-80.52%47.83%-16.16%27.41%-46.34%-5.05%

Correlation

The correlation between DMAC and LOOP is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2017

0.08

The correlation between DMAC and LOOP shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (3 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DMAC:

$303.93M

LOOP:

$62.35M

EPS

DMAC:

-$0.73

LOOP:

-$0.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

DMAC:

$0.00

LOOP:

$514.00K

Gross Profit (TTM)

DMAC:

-$11.00K

LOOP:

$48.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

DMAC:

-$36.69M

LOOP:

-$7.94M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DiaMedica Therapeutics Inc.

Loop Industries, Inc.

Return for Risk

DMAC vs. LOOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMAC
DMAC Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DMAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAC Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAC Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

LOOP
LOOP Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
LOOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOOP Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LOOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOOP Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMAC vs. LOOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DiaMedica Therapeutics Inc. (DMAC) and Loop Industries, Inc. (LOOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMACLOOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.08

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

0.07

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.10

0.12

+1.98

DMAC vs. LOOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the LOOP Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMAC and LOOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMACLOOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

0.05

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

-0.43

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

-0.32

+0.23

Drawdowns

DMAC vs. LOOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMAC drawdown since its inception was -98.16%, roughly equal to the maximum LOOP drawdown of -95.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAC and LOOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMACLOOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.16%

-95.06%

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.68%

-56.80%

+16.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.41%

-80.04%

+26.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.68%

-94.97%

+7.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.21%

-92.78%

+5.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.37%

-62.99%

-8.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.72%

32.45%

-14.73%

Volatility

DMAC vs. LOOP - Volatility Comparison

DiaMedica Therapeutics Inc. (DMAC) has a higher volatility of 14.85% compared to Loop Industries, Inc. (LOOP) at 13.64%. This indicates that DMAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMACLOOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.85%

13.64%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.84%

34.07%

+2.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.32%

76.69%

-9.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.17%

83.38%

-6.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

86.81%

77.71%

+9.10%

Dividends

DMAC vs. LOOP - Dividend Comparison

Neither DMAC nor LOOP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

DMAC vs. LOOP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DiaMedica Therapeutics Inc. and Loop Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00M4.00M6.00M8.00M10.00M202220232024202520260
176.00K
(DMAC) Total Revenue
(LOOP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


DMAC and LOOP have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DMAC has higher volatility (14.85%) compared to LOOP (13.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMAC dropped -98.16% vs LOOP's -95.06%.

DMAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMAC and LOOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer