DLTNX vs. JCPUX
Compare and contrast key facts about DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class N (DLTNX) and JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund Class R6 (JCPUX).
DLTNX is an actively managed fund by DoubleLine. It was launched on Apr 6, 2010. JCPUX is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2005.
Performance
DLTNX vs. JCPUX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DLTNX vs. JCPUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLTNX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class N | -0.47% | 7.66% | 2.94% | 4.96% | -12.77% | -0.01% | 3.87% | 5.74% | 1.50% | 3.44% |
JCPUX JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund Class R6 | 0.26% | 8.07% | 2.87% | 6.46% | -12.73% | -0.10% | 7.87% | 8.93% | -0.05% | 4.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLTNX achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than JCPUX's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, DLTNX has underperformed JCPUX with an annualized return of 1.55%, while JCPUX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.55% annualized return.
DLTNX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 3.67%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- 0.47%
- 10Y*
- 1.55%
JCPUX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- 5.00%
- 3Y*
- 4.62%
- 5Y*
- 1.09%
- 10Y*
- 2.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DLTNX vs. JCPUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DLTNX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than JCPUX's 0.38% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DLTNX vs. JCPUX — Risk / Return Rank
DLTNX
JCPUX
DLTNX vs. JCPUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class N (DLTNX) and JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund Class R6 (JCPUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DLTNX | JCPUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 1.26 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.42 | 1.80 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.23 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 2.09 | -0.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.19 | 6.20 | -2.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DLTNX | JCPUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 1.26 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.19 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.55 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.94 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between DLTNX and JCPUX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DLTNX vs. JCPUX - Dividend Comparison
DLTNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, less than JCPUX's 5.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLTNX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class N | 4.21% | 4.62% | 4.77% | 4.11% | 3.59% | 2.87% | 3.13% | 3.49% | 3.48% | 3.40% | 3.47% | 3.85% |
JCPUX JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund Class R6 | 5.04% | 4.94% | 4.96% | 4.10% | 3.45% | 3.32% | 4.43% | 3.30% | 3.15% | 2.89% | 2.84% | 3.49% |
Drawdowns
DLTNX vs. JCPUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLTNX drawdown since its inception was -16.94%, roughly equal to the maximum JCPUX drawdown of -16.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLTNX and JCPUX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLTNX | JCPUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.94% | -16.81% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | -2.61% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.94% | -16.81% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.94% | -16.81% | -0.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -1.89% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.55% | -2.31% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 0.88% | +0.12% |
Volatility
DLTNX vs. JCPUX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class N (DLTNX) is 1.49%, while JPMorgan Core Plus Bond Fund Class R6 (JCPUX) has a volatility of 1.60%. This indicates that DLTNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JCPUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DLTNX | JCPUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.49% | 1.60% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.42% | 2.47% | -0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.18% | 4.22% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.48% | 5.66% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.33% | 4.62% | -0.29% |