DLTNX vs. DBLSX
Compare and contrast key facts about DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class N (DLTNX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX).
DLTNX is an actively managed fund by DoubleLine. It was launched on Apr 6, 2010. DBLSX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on Sep 30, 2011.
Performance
DLTNX vs. DBLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DLTNX vs. DBLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLTNX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class N | -0.24% | 7.66% | 2.94% | 4.96% | -12.77% | -0.01% | 3.87% | 5.74% | 1.50% | 3.44% |
DBLSX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund | 0.36% | 5.74% | 5.32% | 6.76% | -2.69% | 0.70% | 2.02% | 4.73% | 1.40% | 2.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLTNX achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than DBLSX's 0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, DLTNX has underperformed DBLSX with an annualized return of 1.58%, while DBLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.88% annualized return.
DLTNX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -2.21%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 3.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.56%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
DBLSX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- 4.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 3.11%
- 10Y*
- 2.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DLTNX vs. DBLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DLTNX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DBLSX's 0.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DLTNX vs. DBLSX — Risk / Return Rank
DLTNX
DBLSX
DLTNX vs. DBLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class N (DLTNX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DLTNX | DBLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | 3.69 | -2.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 5.93 | -4.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 2.04 | -0.85 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 6.46 | -4.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.08 | 28.25 | -23.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DLTNX | DBLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 3.69 | -2.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 2.27 | -2.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.05 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.05 | +0.81 |
Correlation
The correlation between DLTNX and DBLSX is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DLTNX vs. DBLSX - Dividend Comparison
DLTNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, which matches DBLSX's 4.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLTNX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class N | 4.20% | 4.62% | 4.77% | 4.11% | 3.59% | 2.87% | 3.13% | 3.49% | 3.48% | 3.40% | 3.47% | 3.85% |
DBLSX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund | 4.19% | 4.64% | 5.09% | 4.49% | 2.50% | 1.72% | 2.37% | 3.21% | 2.92% | 2.42% | 2.52% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
DLTNX vs. DBLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLTNX drawdown since its inception was -16.94%, smaller than the maximum DBLSX drawdown of -57.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLTNX and DBLSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLTNX | DBLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.94% | -57.22% | +40.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | -0.72% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.94% | -4.71% | -12.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.94% | -57.22% | +40.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.21% | -45.38% | +43.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.55% | -31.35% | +28.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.17% | +0.82% |
Volatility
DLTNX vs. DBLSX - Volatility Comparison
DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class N (DLTNX) has a higher volatility of 1.52% compared to DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX) at 0.47%. This indicates that DLTNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DLTNX | DBLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.52% | 0.47% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.42% | 0.80% | +1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.18% | 1.24% | +2.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.48% | 1.38% | +4.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.33% | 63.98% | -59.65% |