DLSNX vs. TSDLX
DLSNX (DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N) and TSDLX (T. Rowe Price Short Duration Income Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, DLSNX returned 2.91%/yr vs 3.33%/yr for TSDLX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DLSNX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TSDLX.
Performance
DLSNX vs. TSDLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLSNX achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly higher than TSDLX's 0.90% return.
DLSNX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 5.22%
- 5Y*
- 2.91%
- 10Y*
- 2.61%
TSDLX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 6.54%
- 3Y*
- 6.92%
- 5Y*
- 3.33%
- 10Y*
- —
DLSNX vs. TSDLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLSNX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N | 0.96% | 5.49% | 5.06% | 6.50% | -3.04% | 0.56% | 0.26% |
TSDLX T. Rowe Price Short Duration Income Fund | 0.90% | 8.12% | 7.69% | 6.68% | -5.69% | 0.77% | 0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between DLSNX and TSDLX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020 | 0.66 |
The correlation between DLSNX and TSDLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DLSNX vs. TSDLX — Risk / Return Rank
DLSNX
TSDLX
DLSNX vs. TSDLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N (DLSNX) and T. Rowe Price Short Duration Income Fund (TSDLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DLSNX | TSDLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.60 | 3.32 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.99 | 7.09 | -1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.00 | 1.99 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.91 | 5.28 | +0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.86 | 22.28 | +5.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DLSNX | TSDLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.60 | 3.32 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.07 | 1.45 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.76 | 1.48 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
DLSNX vs. TSDLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLSNX drawdown since its inception was -7.46%, smaller than the maximum TSDLX drawdown of -7.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLSNX and TSDLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLSNX | TSDLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.46% | -7.86% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.72% | -1.26% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.72% | -1.26% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -4.91% | -7.86% | +2.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.11% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.41% | -1.68% | +1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.15% | 0.29% | -0.14% |
Volatility
DLSNX vs. TSDLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N (DLSNX) is 0.35%, while T. Rowe Price Short Duration Income Fund (TSDLX) has a volatility of 0.56%. This indicates that DLSNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSDLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DLSNX | TSDLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.35% | 0.56% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.87% | 1.41% | -0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19% | 2.00% | -0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.41% | 2.33% | -0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.57% | 2.23% | -0.66% |
DLSNX vs. TSDLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DLSNX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than TSDLX's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DLSNX vs. TSDLX - Dividend Comparison
DLSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than TSDLX's 6.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLSNX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N | 4.30% | 4.40% | 4.85% | 4.25% | 2.24% | 1.47% | 2.12% | 2.96% | 2.67% | 2.18% | 2.27% | 2.22% |
TSDLX T. Rowe Price Short Duration Income Fund | 6.36% | 6.50% | 6.73% | 4.78% | 1.82% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DLSNX and TSDLX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSDLX has higher volatility (0.56%) compared to DLSNX (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLSNX dropped -7.46% vs TSDLX's -7.86%.
DLSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 3.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DLSNX and TSDLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer