PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DLSNX vs. JAAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

DLSNX vs. JAAA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N (DLSNX) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA).

DLSNX is an actively managed fund by DoubleLine. It was launched on Sep 30, 2011. JAAA is an actively managed fund by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Oct 16, 2020.

Performance

DLSNX vs. JAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N (DLSNX) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DLSNX vs. JAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DLSNX
DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N		0.32%5.49%5.06%6.50%-3.04%0.56%0.76%
JAAA
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF		0.73%5.16%7.43%8.59%0.49%1.39%0.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLSNX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than JAAA's 0.73% return.

DLSNX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
0.32%
6M
1.41%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
5.15%
5Y*
2.86%
10Y*
2.61%

JAAA

1D
0.12%
1M
0.38%
YTD
0.73%
6M
2.11%
1Y
5.05%
3Y*
6.82%
5Y*
4.57%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N

Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF

Often compared with DLSNX:
DLSNX vs. BNDDLSNX vs. BSVDLSNX vs. VCSHDLSNX vs. VFSTXDLSNX vs. NEARDLSNX vs. MINTDLSNX vs. VCIT
Often compared with JAAA:
JAAA vs. PAAAJAAA vs. JBBBJAAA vs. AAAJAAA vs. CLOZJAAA vs. BINCJAAA vs. ICLOJAAA vs. BOXX

DLSNX vs. JAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLSNX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than JAAA's 0.21% expense ratio.

DLSNX
DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N
JAAA
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF

Return for Risk

DLSNX vs. JAAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DLSNX
DLSNX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
DLSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DLSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
JAAA
JAAA Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
JAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
JAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLSNX vs. JAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N (DLSNX) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

DLSNXJAAADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.40

2.80

+0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.53

3.60

+1.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.90

1.91

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.10

3.54

+2.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

27.65

24.70

+2.94

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DLSNX vs. JAAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLSNX Sharpe Ratio is 3.40, which is comparable to the JAAA Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLSNX and JAAA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

DLSNXJAAADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.40

2.80

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.05

2.71

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

2.70

-2.68

Correlation

The correlation between DLSNX and JAAA is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DLSNX vs. JAAA - Dividend Comparison

DLSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, less than JAAA's 5.62% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLSNX
DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N		3.96%4.40%4.85%4.25%2.24%1.47%2.12%2.96%2.67%2.18%2.27%2.22%
JAAA
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF		5.62%5.30%6.35%6.11%2.74%1.21%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DLSNX vs. JAAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLSNX drawdown since its inception was -86.56%, which is greater than JAAA's maximum drawdown of -2.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLSNX and JAAA.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

DLSNXJAAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.56%

-2.64%

-83.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.72%

-1.46%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.91%

-2.64%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.56%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.09%

-0.03%

-83.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.17%

-0.26%

-49.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.16%

0.21%

-0.05%

Volatility

DLSNX vs. JAAA - Volatility Comparison

DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N (DLSNX) has a higher volatility of 0.45% compared to Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) at 0.41%. This indicates that DLSNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

DLSNXJAAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

0.41%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.81%

0.68%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27%

1.81%

-0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.40%

1.69%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

203.30%

1.67%

+201.63%