DLSNX vs. DBLLX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DLSNX (DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N) and DBLLX (DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund) are both mutual funds - DLSNX is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by DoubleLine, while DBLLX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by DoubleLine. Over the past 10 years, DLSNX returned 2.61%/yr vs 3.53%/yr for DBLLX. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DLSNX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for DBLLX.

Performance

DLSNX vs. DBLLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N (DLSNX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLSNX achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than DBLLX's 1.10% return. Over the past 10 years, DLSNX has underperformed DBLLX with an annualized return of 2.61%, while DBLLX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.53% annualized return.

DLSNX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 0.96%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: 4.26%
• 3Y*: 5.22%
• 5Y*: 2.91%
• 10Y*: 2.61%

DBLLX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 1.10%
• 6M: 1.52%
• 1Y: 5.39%
• 3Y*: 6.99%
• 5Y*: 3.45%
• 10Y*: 3.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLSNX vs. DBLLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DLSNX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N	0.96%	5.49%	5.06%	6.50%	-3.04%	0.56%	1.76%	4.47%	1.15%	2.30%
DBLLX DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund	1.10%	7.86%	7.20%	7.00%	-5.05%	-0.21%	3.53%	8.57%	-0.04%	4.20%

Correlation

The correlation between DLSNX and DBLLX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2014	0.42

Return for Risk

DLSNX vs. DBLLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLSNX

DLSNX Risk / Return Rank: 97
DLSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
DLSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
DLSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
DLSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
DLSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

DBLLX

DBLLX Risk / Return Rank: 98
DBLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
DBLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
DBLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
DBLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
DBLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLSNX vs. DBLLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N (DLSNX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DLSNX	DBLLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.60	4.80	-1.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.99	8.78	-2.79
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.00	2.63	-0.62
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.91	5.98	-0.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	27.86	27.44	+0.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DLSNX vs. DBLLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLSNX Sharpe Ratio is 3.60, which is comparable to the DBLLX Sharpe Ratio of 4.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLSNX and DBLLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DLSNX	DBLLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.60	4.80	-1.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.07	1.79	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.67	1.86	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.76	1.70	+0.06

Drawdowns

DLSNX vs. DBLLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLSNX drawdown since its inception was -7.46%, smaller than the maximum DBLLX drawdown of -10.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLSNX and DBLLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DLSNX	DBLLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.46%	-10.13%	+2.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.72%	-0.92%	+0.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.72%	-1.35%	+0.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-4.91%	-10.13%	+5.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-7.46%	-10.13%	+2.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.11%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.41%	-1.29%	+0.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.15%	0.20%	-0.05%

Volatility

DLSNX vs. DBLLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N (DLSNX) is 0.35%, while DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX) has a volatility of 0.42%. This indicates that DLSNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBLLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DLSNX	DBLLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.35%	0.42%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.87%	0.90%	-0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19%	1.15%	+0.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.41%	1.94%	-0.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.57%	1.90%	-0.33%

DLSNX vs. DBLLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLSNX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than DBLLX's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

DLSNX vs. DBLLX - Dividend Comparison

DLSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than DBLLX's 5.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBLLX DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund	5.08%	5.27%	4.70%	3.74%	2.41%	2.15%	2.61%	4.93%	2.87%	3.00%	3.19%	3.77%
DLSNX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund Class N	4.30%	4.40%	4.85%	4.25%	2.24%	1.47%	2.12%	2.96%	2.67%	2.18%	2.27%	2.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DLSNX and DBLLX in my portfolio?

DLSNX and DBLLX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DLSNX or DBLLX?

DBLLX has higher volatility (0.42%) compared to DLSNX (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLSNX dropped -7.46% vs DBLLX's -10.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBLLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.80 vs 3.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.