PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLS vs. ISCF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLS vs. ISCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend (DLS) and iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLS achieves a 6.63% return, which is significantly lower than ISCF's 7.28% return. Over the past 10 years, DLS has underperformed ISCF with an annualized return of 7.46%, while ISCF has yielded a comparatively higher 9.19% annualized return.


DLS

1D
-0.94%
1M
0.80%
YTD
6.63%
6M
9.37%
1Y
22.56%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
7.46%

ISCF

1D
-1.13%
1M
1.65%
YTD
7.28%
6M
10.16%
1Y
21.96%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*
9.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLS vs. ISCF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLS
WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend
6.63%34.11%3.06%15.33%-17.31%11.71%-1.28%22.20%-18.95%31.83%
ISCF
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
7.28%33.65%4.75%11.50%-15.07%13.31%7.65%26.32%-18.76%38.13%

Correlation

The correlation between DLS and ISCF is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2015

0.87

The correlation between DLS and ISCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

DLS vs. ISCF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DLS
ISCF

Industrials

27.8%
23.3%

Financial Services

13.3%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
12.4%

Basic Materials

8.9%
11.2%

Technology

8.4%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
4.1%

Real Estate

7.8%
8.8%

Communication Services

4.4%
3.8%

Healthcare

3.7%
5.4%

Energy

3.0%
4.8%

Utilities

2.1%
3.6%

Industrials

DLS
27.8%
ISCF
23.3%

Financial Services

DLS
13.3%
ISCF
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DLS
12.8%
ISCF
12.4%

Basic Materials

DLS
8.9%
ISCF
11.2%

Technology

DLS
8.4%
ISCF
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

DLS
7.9%
ISCF
4.1%

Real Estate

DLS
7.8%
ISCF
8.8%

Communication Services

DLS
4.4%
ISCF
3.8%

Healthcare

DLS
3.7%
ISCF
5.4%

Energy

DLS
3.0%
ISCF
4.8%

Utilities

DLS
2.1%
ISCF
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLS vs. ISCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLS
DLS Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
DLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCF
ISCF Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ISCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCF Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCF Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLS vs. ISCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend (DLS) and iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DLSISCFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.69

1.54

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.41

2.18

+0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.28

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

1.94

+0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.55

7.28

+0.27

DLS vs. ISCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the ISCF Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLS and ISCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DLSISCFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

1.54

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.44

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.53

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.49

-0.15

Drawdowns

DLS vs. ISCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLS drawdown since its inception was -63.13%, which is greater than ISCF's maximum drawdown of -40.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLS and ISCF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLSISCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.13%

-40.79%

-22.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.04%

-11.34%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.69%

-13.85%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.22%

-30.70%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.77%

-40.79%

-3.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.20%

-2.64%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.65%

-8.14%

-5.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

3.02%

-0.03%

Volatility

DLS vs. ISCF - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend (DLS) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) at 4.33%. This indicates that DLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLSISCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

4.33%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.98%

11.86%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.44%

14.39%

-0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.57%

16.66%

-1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

17.44%

-0.77%

DLS vs. ISCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCF's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLS vs. ISCF - Dividend Comparison

DLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, which matches ISCF's 3.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLS
WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend
3.50%3.87%4.56%4.29%4.96%3.29%2.50%3.37%3.66%2.79%3.29%2.72%
ISCF
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
3.50%3.76%4.29%3.94%2.73%3.93%2.30%2.87%2.14%1.97%2.89%1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, DLS and ISCF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DLS has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to ISCF (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLS dropped -63.13% vs ISCF's -40.79%.

On 10-year performance, ISCF leads with 9.19% vs 7.46% for DLS. On fees, ISCF is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, ISCF has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ISCF has performed better with a 9.19% return vs 7.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCF is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DLS.

DLS and ISCF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 3.50%.

DLS tracks WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Index, while ISCF tracks MSCI World exUSA SmallCap Diversified Multi-Factor. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DLS and 0.40% for ISCF.

DLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLS and ISCF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer