DLNV vs. FBUF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DLNV (FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November) and FBUF (Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. DLNV is passively managed, while FBUF is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DLNV charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FBUF.

Performance

DLNV vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November (DLNV) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLNV achieves a 4.86% return, which is significantly higher than FBUF's 3.62% return.

DLNV

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: 4.86%
• 6M: 4.58%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBUF

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: -0.79%
• YTD: 3.62%
• 6M: 3.09%
• 1Y: 16.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLNV vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DLNV FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November	4.86%	1.88%
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	3.62%	3.63%

Correlation

The correlation between DLNV and FBUF is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025	0.91

Return for Risk

DLNV vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLNV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FBUF

FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 68
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLNV vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November (DLNV) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DLNV	FBUF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.05	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.74	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.40	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.95	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.59	—

Drawdowns

DLNV vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLNV drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum FBUF drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLNV and FBUF.

Drawdown Indicators

	DLNV	FBUF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.83%	-11.09%	+6.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.65%	-1.83%	+1.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.64%	-1.38%	+0.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.31%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DLNV	FBUF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.44%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.11%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.18%	8.11%	-0.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.18%	9.69%	-2.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.18%	9.69%	-2.51%

DLNV vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLNV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

DLNV vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison

DLNV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DLNV FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	0.60%	0.64%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DLNV and FBUF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, DLNV and FBUF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, DLNV or FBUF?

On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DLNV or FBUF?

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DLNV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DLNV or FBUF?

FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for DLNV.

What is the main difference between DLNV and FBUF?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DLNV and 0.48% for FBUF.