DLDRX vs. DGLRX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX) and BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund (DGLRX).
DLDRX is managed by Dreyfus. It was launched on Oct 30, 2003. DGLRX is managed by Dreyfus. It was launched on Dec 28, 2006.
Performance
DLDRX vs. DGLRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DLDRX vs. DGLRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLDRX BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund | 24.66% | 15.04% | 0.81% | 1.58% | 34.18% | 38.30% | 6.58% | 16.64% | -17.57% | 14.05% |
DGLRX BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund | -5.04% | 8.59% | 17.14% | 21.48% | -19.14% | 17.63% | 19.50% | 29.57% | -1.69% | 24.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLDRX achieves a 24.66% return, which is significantly higher than DGLRX's -5.04% return. Over the past 10 years, DLDRX has outperformed DGLRX with an annualized return of 14.51%, while DGLRX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.53% annualized return.
DLDRX
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- 24.66%
- 6M
- 33.50%
- 1Y
- 49.03%
- 3Y*
- 14.64%
- 5Y*
- 18.06%
- 10Y*
- 14.51%
DGLRX
- 1D
- 2.45%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- -5.04%
- 6M
- -4.79%
- 1Y
- 6.14%
- 3Y*
- 9.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.53%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DLDRX vs. DGLRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DLDRX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than DGLRX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DLDRX vs. DGLRX — Risk / Return Rank
DLDRX
DGLRX
DLDRX vs. DGLRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX) and BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund (DGLRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DLDRX | DGLRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.89 | 0.41 | +1.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.35 | 0.71 | +1.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.09 | +0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 0.61 | +1.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.83 | 2.18 | +8.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DLDRX | DGLRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 0.41 | +1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.40 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.64 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.46 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between DLDRX and DGLRX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DLDRX vs. DGLRX - Dividend Comparison
DLDRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than DGLRX's 32.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLDRX BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund | 1.87% | 2.33% | 7.45% | 12.42% | 9.66% | 5.07% | 1.11% | 2.16% | 1.87% | 0.63% | 1.44% | 1.25% |
DGLRX BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund | 32.66% | 30.57% | 17.41% | 17.89% | 11.97% | 8.65% | 5.71% | 5.00% | 7.11% | 8.01% | 3.83% | 6.46% |
Drawdowns
DLDRX vs. DGLRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLDRX drawdown since its inception was -69.13%, which is greater than DGLRX's maximum drawdown of -43.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLDRX and DGLRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLDRX | DGLRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.13% | -43.83% | -25.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.88% | -11.27% | -9.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.44% | -29.20% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.24% | -29.20% | -25.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -8.75% | +8.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.92% | -5.97% | -14.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.59% | 3.17% | +1.42% |
Volatility
DLDRX vs. DGLRX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX) has a higher volatility of 6.23% compared to BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund (DGLRX) at 5.31%. This indicates that DLDRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGLRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DLDRX | DGLRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.23% | 5.31% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.24% | 9.66% | +5.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.59% | 16.35% | +10.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.95% | 16.52% | +9.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.57% | 16.62% | +8.95% |