PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLBMX vs. MBCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLBMX vs. MBCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MassMutual Small Cap Opportunities Fund (DLBMX) and MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund (MBCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLBMX achieves a 11.19% return, which is significantly higher than MBCSX's 4.17% return. Over the past 10 years, DLBMX has underperformed MBCSX with an annualized return of 14.12%, while MBCSX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.30% annualized return.


DLBMX

1D
-0.54%
1M
1.11%
YTD
11.19%
6M
11.05%
1Y
22.59%
3Y*
15.12%
5Y*
13.25%
10Y*
14.12%

MBCSX

1D
0.46%
1M
4.89%
YTD
4.17%
6M
4.48%
1Y
19.29%
3Y*
23.54%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
17.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLBMX vs. MBCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLBMX
MassMutual Small Cap Opportunities Fund
11.19%8.07%12.30%17.43%-16.19%64.90%19.75%25.54%-11.14%13.90%
MBCSX
MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund
4.17%16.68%35.05%51.00%-34.11%17.05%33.53%38.41%0.22%34.43%

Correlation

The correlation between DLBMX and MBCSX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2001

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between DLBMX and MBCSX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLBMX vs. MBCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLBMX
DLBMX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
DLBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
DLBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

MBCSX
MBCSX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MBCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
MBCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLBMX vs. MBCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Small Cap Opportunities Fund (DLBMX) and MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund (MBCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DLBMXMBCSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

1.27

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.95

1.77

+0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.23

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.13

+0.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.94

3.67

+3.28

DLBMX vs. MBCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLBMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the MBCSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLBMX and MBCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DLBMXMBCSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.27

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.41

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.68

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.44

-0.02

Drawdowns

DLBMX vs. MBCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLBMX drawdown since its inception was -65.12%, which is greater than MBCSX's maximum drawdown of -54.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLBMX and MBCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLBMXMBCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.12%

-54.66%

-10.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.42%

-17.47%

+5.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.84%

-22.92%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.39%

-48.37%

+18.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.55%

-48.37%

+5.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

0.00%

-1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.21%

-12.03%

+1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

5.37%

-2.14%

Volatility

DLBMX vs. MBCSX - Volatility Comparison

MassMutual Small Cap Opportunities Fund (DLBMX) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund (MBCSX) at 3.47%. This indicates that DLBMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLBMXMBCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

3.47%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.72%

11.80%

+0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.28%

15.84%

+1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.67%

29.81%

+1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.18%

25.59%

+2.59%

DLBMX vs. MBCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLBMX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MBCSX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLBMX vs. MBCSX - Dividend Comparison

DLBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.09%, less than MBCSX's 41.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLBMX
MassMutual Small Cap Opportunities Fund
9.09%10.11%9.33%4.73%0.88%35.42%7.82%0.46%11.94%13.55%3.14%11.15%
MBCSX
MassMutual Blue Chip Growth Fund
41.56%43.29%13.12%23.06%18.44%21.93%4.59%11.06%6.70%4.00%4.77%18.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLBMX and MBCSX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DLBMX has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to MBCSX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLBMX dropped -65.12% vs MBCSX's -54.66%.

DLBMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLBMX and MBCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer