DL2P.L vs. 3TSM.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

DL2P.L (L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and 3TSM.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities) are both Leveraged Equities funds - DL2P.L tracks the LevDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR while 3TSM.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x TSM Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DL2P.L returned 22.26%/yr vs 109.51%/yr for 3TSM.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DL2P.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 3TSM.L.

Performance

DL2P.L vs. 3TSM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DL2P.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities (3TSM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

DL2P.L is traded in GBp, while 3TSM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3TSM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DL2P.L achieves a -4.61% return, which is significantly lower than 3TSM.L's 55.06% return.

DL2P.L

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -3.28%
• 6M: -9.64%
• YTD: -4.61%
• 1Y: -5.87%
• 3Y*: 22.26%
• 5Y*: 11.86%
• 10Y*: 13.00%

3TSM.L

• 1D: -9.86%
• 1M: -32.24%
• 6M: 6.64%
• YTD: 55.06%
• 1Y: 130.42%
• 3Y*: 109.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DL2P.L vs. 3TSM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DL2P.L L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	-4.61%	44.27%	25.79%	31.85%	-23.59%	2.81%
3TSM.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities	55.06%	49.11%	295.74%	79.82%	-83.35%	-0.87%

Correlation

The correlation between DL2P.L and 3TSM.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021	0.42

Return for Risk

DL2P.L vs. 3TSM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DL2P.L

DL2P.L Risk / Return Rank: 8
DL2P.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
DL2P.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
DL2P.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8
DL2P.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
DL2P.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7

3TSM.L

3TSM.L Risk / Return Rank: 53
3TSM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
3TSM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
3TSM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 45
3TSM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
3TSM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DL2P.L vs. 3TSM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DL2P.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities (3TSM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DL2P.L	3TSM.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.19	1.16	-1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.05	2.03	-2.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.23	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.25	2.86	-3.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.69	7.55	-8.24

DL2P.L vs. 3TSM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DL2P.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the 3TSM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DL2P.L and 3TSM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DL2P.L vs. 3TSM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DL2P.L drawdown since its inception was -63.02%, smaller than the maximum 3TSM.L drawdown of -92.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DL2P.L and 3TSM.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	DL2P.L	3TSM.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.02%	-92.47%	+29.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.87%	-45.33%	+21.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.21%	-82.66%	+54.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.68%	-44.91%	+34.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.32%	-50.30%	+33.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.52%	17.20%	-8.68%

Volatility

DL2P.L vs. 3TSM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G DAX Daily 2x Long UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DL2P.L) is 9.40%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) ETP Securities (3TSM.L) has a volatility of 43.29%. This indicates that DL2P.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3TSM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DL2P.L	3TSM.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.40%	43.29%	-33.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.51%	85.92%	-59.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.14%	112.21%	-81.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.70%	120.76%	-87.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.50%	120.76%	-85.26%

DL2P.L vs. 3TSM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DL2P.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than 3TSM.L's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

DL2P.L vs. 3TSM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DL2P.L nor 3TSM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DL2P.L and 3TSM.L in my portfolio?

DL2P.L and 3TSM.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DL2P.L or 3TSM.L?

On fees, DL2P.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DL2P.L or 3TSM.L?

DL2P.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3TSM.L.

What is the main difference between DL2P.L and 3TSM.L?

DL2P.L tracks LevDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR, while 3TSM.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x TSM Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DL2P.L and 0.75% for 3TSM.L.