PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJSC.AS vs. WITS.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJSC.AS vs. WITS.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares EURO STOXX Small UCITS ETF (DJSC.AS) and iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF (WITS.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DJSC.AS is traded in EUR, while WITS.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WITS.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJSC.AS achieves a 9.46% return, which is significantly lower than WITS.AS's 27.11% return.


DJSC.AS

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.65%
YTD
9.46%
6M
12.92%
1Y
19.20%
3Y*
10.86%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
8.71%

WITS.AS

1D
-0.39%
1M
19.09%
YTD
27.11%
6M
26.03%
1Y
48.09%
3Y*
28.76%
5Y*
21.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJSC.AS vs. WITS.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DJSC.AS
iShares EURO STOXX Small UCITS ETF
9.46%21.43%-2.89%12.25%-14.19%21.56%8.54%5.63%
WITS.AS
iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF
27.11%7.87%36.46%55.38%-29.14%39.85%32.58%11.53%

Correlation

The correlation between DJSC.AS and WITS.AS is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2019

0.56

The correlation between DJSC.AS and WITS.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJSC.AS vs. WITS.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJSC.AS
DJSC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DJSC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJSC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJSC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DJSC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJSC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

WITS.AS
WITS.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
WITS.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WITS.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
WITS.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
WITS.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
WITS.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJSC.AS vs. WITS.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EURO STOXX Small UCITS ETF (DJSC.AS) and iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF (WITS.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DJSC.ASWITS.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.40

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

3.12

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.32

8.28

-1.96

DJSC.AS vs. WITS.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJSC.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the WITS.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJSC.AS and WITS.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DJSC.ASWITS.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.35

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.93

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

1.01

-0.64

Drawdowns

DJSC.AS vs. WITS.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJSC.AS drawdown since its inception was -63.04%, which is greater than WITS.AS's maximum drawdown of -31.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJSC.AS and WITS.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJSC.ASWITS.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.04%

-31.15%

-31.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-15.21%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.05%

-28.65%

+12.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.17%

-30.51%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-0.39%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.33%

-7.80%

-5.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

5.76%

-2.75%

Volatility

DJSC.AS vs. WITS.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares EURO STOXX Small UCITS ETF (DJSC.AS) is 4.38%, while iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF (WITS.AS) has a volatility of 6.76%. This indicates that DJSC.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WITS.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJSC.ASWITS.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

6.76%

-2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.74%

15.33%

-3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.87%

20.27%

-6.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

23.32%

-7.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.35%

24.25%

-7.90%

DJSC.AS vs. WITS.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJSC.AS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than WITS.AS's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

DJSC.AS vs. WITS.AS - Dividend Comparison

DJSC.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than WITS.AS's 0.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DJSC.AS
iShares EURO STOXX Small UCITS ETF
2.40%3.00%2.66%2.24%2.22%1.48%1.20%2.01%2.48%1.81%2.10%2.12%
WITS.AS
iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF
0.25%0.31%0.38%0.46%0.81%0.41%0.73%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DJSC.AS and WITS.AS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WITS.AS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WITS.AS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DJSC.AS.

DJSC.AS is categorized as Europe Equities, while WITS.AS is Technology Equities. DJSC.AS tracks MSCI EMU SMID NR EUR, while WITS.AS tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DJSC.AS and 0.25% for WITS.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJSC.AS and WITS.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer