PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJRE.AX vs. BOND.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJRE.AX vs. BOND.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ESG Tilted ETF (DJRE.AX) and State Street SPDR S&P/ASX iBoxx Australian Bond ETF (BOND.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJRE.AX achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly higher than BOND.AX's 1.98% return. Over the past 10 years, DJRE.AX has outperformed BOND.AX with an annualized return of 3.56%, while BOND.AX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.40% annualized return.


DJRE.AX

1D
0.09%
1M
1.75%
6M
6.26%
YTD
6.95%
1Y
9.62%
3Y*
7.79%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*
3.56%

BOND.AX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.03%
6M
1.38%
YTD
1.98%
1Y
2.21%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
-0.36%
10Y*
1.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJRE.AX vs. BOND.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DJRE.AX
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ESG Tilted ETF
6.95%2.61%7.87%11.14%-20.36%38.59%-19.06%18.19%4.70%-0.78%
BOND.AX
State Street SPDR S&P/ASX iBoxx Australian Bond ETF
1.98%3.65%2.45%5.10%-11.40%-3.40%3.81%7.79%4.70%3.50%

Correlation

The correlation between DJRE.AX and BOND.AX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013

0.14

Over the past year, DJRE.AX and BOND.AX have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJRE.AX vs. BOND.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJRE.AX
DJRE.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
DJRE.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJRE.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJRE.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
DJRE.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJRE.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

BOND.AX
BOND.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BOND.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOND.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOND.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BOND.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOND.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJRE.AX vs. BOND.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ESG Tilted ETF (DJRE.AX) and State Street SPDR S&P/ASX iBoxx Australian Bond ETF (BOND.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DJRE.AXBOND.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.10

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

0.70

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.83

1.49

+1.33

DJRE.AX vs. BOND.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJRE.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the BOND.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJRE.AX and BOND.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DJRE.AX vs. BOND.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJRE.AX drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, which is greater than BOND.AX's maximum drawdown of -17.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJRE.AX and BOND.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJRE.AXBOND.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-17.15%

-17.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-3.35%

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.63%

-4.16%

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.27%

-16.69%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

-17.15%

-17.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-3.54%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.53%

-3.97%

-4.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

1.61%

+2.02%

Volatility

DJRE.AX vs. BOND.AX - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ESG Tilted ETF (DJRE.AX) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to State Street SPDR S&P/ASX iBoxx Australian Bond ETF (BOND.AX) at 0.83%. This indicates that DJRE.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOND.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJRE.AXBOND.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

0.83%

+3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

3.03%

+7.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.49%

4.19%

+9.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.16%

5.66%

+9.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

5.01%

+10.98%

DJRE.AX vs. BOND.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJRE.AX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BOND.AX's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DJRE.AX vs. BOND.AX - Dividend Comparison

DJRE.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than BOND.AX's 4.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOND.AX
State Street SPDR S&P/ASX iBoxx Australian Bond ETF
4.09%2.90%1.06%0.17%0.73%1.87%1.60%1.76%2.62%2.67%3.64%3.41%
DJRE.AX
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ESG Tilted ETF
2.69%2.82%1.70%2.80%6.57%2.81%2.62%2.68%4.20%3.45%3.22%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


DJRE.AX and BOND.AX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BOND.AX is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BOND.AX is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for DJRE.AX.

DJRE.AX is categorized as REIT, while BOND.AX is Total Bond Market. DJRE.AX tracks Dow Jones Global Select ESG Tilted Real Estate Securities Index, while BOND.AX tracks S&P/ASX iBoxx Australian Fixed Interest Diversified 0+ Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for DJRE.AX and 0.10% for BOND.AX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJRE.AX and BOND.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer