DJMC.AS vs. ICHN.AS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares EURO STOXX Mid UCITS ETF (DJMC.AS) and iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF (ICHN.AS).

DJMC.AS and ICHN.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DJMC.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU SMID NR EUR. It was launched on Oct 29, 2004. ICHN.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Jun 20, 2019. Both DJMC.AS and ICHN.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

DJMC.AS vs. ICHN.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares EURO STOXX Mid UCITS ETF (DJMC.AS) and iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF (ICHN.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DJMC.AS vs. ICHN.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DJMC.AS iShares EURO STOXX Mid UCITS ETF	3.08%	24.35%	8.45%	10.46%	-14.94%	16.39%	2.11%	9.95%
ICHN.AS iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF	-5.12%	16.07%	26.38%	-14.37%	-17.72%	-16.22%	18.94%	12.49%

Different Trading Currencies

DJMC.AS is traded in EUR, while ICHN.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ICHN.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJMC.AS achieves a 3.08% return, which is significantly higher than ICHN.AS's -5.12% return.

DJMC.AS

• 1D: 2.78%
• 1M: -2.55%
• YTD: 3.08%
• 6M: 7.94%
• 1Y: 19.09%
• 3Y*: 12.75%
• 5Y*: 6.90%
• 10Y*: 8.64%

ICHN.AS

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: -2.70%
• YTD: -5.12%
• 6M: -12.35%
• 1Y: -1.80%
• 3Y*: 4.82%
• 5Y*: -4.88%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJMC.AS vs. ICHN.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DJMC.AS and ICHN.AS have an expense ratio of 0.40%.

DJMC.AS

iShares EURO STOXX Mid UCITS ETF

ICHN.AS

iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

DJMC.AS vs. ICHN.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJMC.AS

DJMC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 72
DJMC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
DJMC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
DJMC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 67
DJMC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
DJMC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 77

ICHN.AS

ICHN.AS Risk / Return Rank: 23
ICHN.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
ICHN.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
ICHN.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 17
ICHN.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
ICHN.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJMC.AS vs. ICHN.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EURO STOXX Mid UCITS ETF (DJMC.AS) and iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF (ICHN.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DJMC.AS	ICHN.AS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	-0.08	+1.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	0.04	+1.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.01	+0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	0.59	+2.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.04	1.52	+7.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DJMC.AS vs. ICHN.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJMC.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the ICHN.AS Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJMC.AS and ICHN.AS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DJMC.AS	ICHN.AS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.28	-0.08	+1.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	-0.17	+0.62
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.05	+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between DJMC.AS and ICHN.AS is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DJMC.AS vs. ICHN.AS - Dividend Comparison

DJMC.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, while ICHN.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DJMC.AS iShares EURO STOXX Mid UCITS ETF	3.07%	3.20%	3.37%	2.55%	2.40%	1.76%	1.45%	2.55%	2.97%	2.18%	2.22%	2.03%
ICHN.AS iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

DJMC.AS vs. ICHN.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJMC.AS drawdown since its inception was -59.52%, which is greater than ICHN.AS's maximum drawdown of -55.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJMC.AS and ICHN.AS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DJMC.AS	ICHN.AS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.52%	-62.67%	+3.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.08%	-16.87%	+5.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.41%	-56.59%	+29.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.88%	-34.83%	+30.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.30%	-33.80%	+20.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.39%	6.08%	-3.69%

Volatility

DJMC.AS vs. ICHN.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares EURO STOXX Mid UCITS ETF (DJMC.AS) is 5.76%, while iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF (ICHN.AS) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that DJMC.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICHN.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DJMC.AS	ICHN.AS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.76%	7.14%	-1.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.16%	14.25%	-5.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.84%	22.36%	-7.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.48%	27.72%	-12.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.49%	28.06%	-11.57%