PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJIA vs. OMAH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJIA vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJIA achieves a 3.46% return, which is significantly lower than OMAH's 5.13% return.


DJIA

1D
0.00%
1M
3.03%
YTD
3.46%
6M
3.90%
1Y
14.27%
3Y*
10.45%
5Y*
10Y*

OMAH

1D
0.54%
1M
0.72%
YTD
5.13%
6M
5.28%
1Y
12.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJIA vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DJIA and OMAH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025

0.56

The correlation between DJIA and OMAH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

DJIA vs. OMAH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DJIA
OMAH

Financial Services

27.2%
38.9%

Industrials

18.4%

-

Technology

17.1%
13.6%

Healthcare

13.1%
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
16.2%

Basic Materials

4.0%

-

Energy

2.4%
10.5%

Communication Services

1.9%
9.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

DJIA
27.2%
OMAH
38.9%

Industrials

DJIA
18.4%
OMAH

-

Technology

DJIA
17.1%
OMAH
13.6%

Healthcare

DJIA
13.1%
OMAH
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DJIA
11.6%
OMAH
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

DJIA
4.4%
OMAH
16.2%

Basic Materials

DJIA
4.0%
OMAH

-

Energy

DJIA
2.4%
OMAH
10.5%

Communication Services

DJIA
1.9%
OMAH
9.8%

Real Estate

DJIA

-

OMAH

-

Utilities

DJIA

-

OMAH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJIA vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJIA
DJIA Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
DJIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJIA Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DJIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJIA Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

OMAH
OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJIA vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DJIAOMAHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.27

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

4.12

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.25

10.16

-2.91

DJIA vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJIA Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the OMAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJIA and OMAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DJIAOMAHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

1.54

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.74

-0.05

Drawdowns

DJIA vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJIA drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJIA and OMAH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJIAOMAHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.91%

-11.83%

-5.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-3.00%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-2.12%

+1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.59%

-1.26%

-2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.22%

+0.75%

Volatility

DJIA vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) is 1.66%, while VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) has a volatility of 1.99%. This indicates that DJIA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJIAOMAHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

1.99%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.24%

5.50%

+0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.74%

8.06%

-0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.19%

13.20%

-2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.19%

13.20%

-2.01%

DJIA vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJIA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

DJIA vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

DJIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.82%, less than OMAH's 15.36% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DJIA
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF
10.82%10.60%11.44%7.16%9.18%
OMAH
VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF
15.36%12.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DJIA and OMAH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OMAH has higher volatility (1.99%) compared to DJIA (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJIA dropped -16.91% vs OMAH's -11.83%.

On 1-year performance, DJIA leads with 14.27% vs 12.34% for OMAH. On fees, DJIA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, DJIA has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DJIA has performed better with a 14.27% return vs 12.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DJIA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.36%, compared with 10.82% for DJIA.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DJIA and 0.95% for OMAH.

DJIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJIA and OMAH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer