PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJIA vs. LQTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJIA vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJIA achieves a 3.46% return, which is significantly higher than LQTI's 0.63% return.


DJIA

1D
0.00%
1M
3.03%
YTD
3.46%
6M
3.90%
1Y
14.27%
3Y*
10.45%
5Y*
10Y*

LQTI

1D
0.47%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.63%
6M
0.68%
1Y
5.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJIA vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DJIA and LQTI is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJIA vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJIA
DJIA Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
DJIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJIA Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DJIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJIA Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

LQTI
LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJIA vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DJIALQTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.19

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

1.64

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.25

5.02

+2.23

DJIA vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJIA Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJIA and LQTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DJIALQTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

1.10

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.94

-0.25

Drawdowns

DJIA vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJIA drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJIA and LQTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJIALQTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.91%

-3.41%

-13.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-3.41%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.97%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.59%

-0.88%

-2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.11%

+0.86%

Volatility

DJIA vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) have volatilities of 1.66% and 1.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJIALQTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

1.67%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.24%

4.04%

+2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.74%

5.12%

+2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.19%

5.97%

+5.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.19%

5.97%

+5.22%

DJIA vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJIA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

DJIA vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

DJIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.82%, more than LQTI's 9.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DJIA
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF
10.82%10.60%11.44%7.16%9.18%
LQTI
FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF
9.07%7.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DJIA and LQTI have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LQTI has higher volatility (1.67%) compared to DJIA (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJIA dropped -16.91% vs LQTI's -3.41%.

On 1-year performance, DJIA leads with 14.27% vs 5.55% for LQTI. On fees, DJIA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DJIA has performed better with a 14.27% return vs 5.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DJIA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LQTI.

DJIA has the higher dividend yield at 10.82%, compared with 9.07% for LQTI.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DJIA and 0.65% for LQTI.

DJIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJIA and LQTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer