DJIA vs. LQTI
DJIA (Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. DJIA is passively managed, while LQTI is actively managed. Over the past year, DJIA returned 14.27% vs 5.55% for LQTI. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DJIA charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
DJIA vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DJIA achieves a 3.46% return, which is significantly higher than LQTI's 0.63% return.
DJIA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.03%
- YTD
- 3.46%
- 6M
- 3.90%
- 1Y
- 14.27%
- 3Y*
- 10.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- 5.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DJIA vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DJIA Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF | 3.46% | 5.19% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 0.63% | 6.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between DJIA and LQTI is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DJIA vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
DJIA
LQTI
DJIA vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DJIA | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.19 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 1.64 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.25 | 5.02 | +2.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DJIA | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 1.10 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.94 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
DJIA vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DJIA drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJIA and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DJIA | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.91% | -3.41% | -13.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.34% | -3.41% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.97% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.59% | -0.88% | -2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 1.11% | +0.86% |
Volatility
DJIA vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) have volatilities of 1.66% and 1.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DJIA | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.66% | 1.67% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.24% | 4.04% | +2.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.74% | 5.12% | +2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.19% | 5.97% | +5.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.19% | 5.97% | +5.22% |
DJIA vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DJIA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
DJIA vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
DJIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.82%, more than LQTI's 9.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DJIA Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF | 10.82% | 10.60% | 11.44% | 7.16% | 9.18% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.07% | 7.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DJIA and LQTI have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LQTI has higher volatility (1.67%) compared to DJIA (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJIA dropped -16.91% vs LQTI's -3.41%.
On 1-year performance, DJIA leads with 14.27% vs 5.55% for LQTI. On fees, DJIA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DJIA has performed better with a 14.27% return vs 5.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DJIA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LQTI.
DJIA has the higher dividend yield at 10.82%, compared with 9.07% for LQTI.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DJIA and 0.65% for LQTI.
DJIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DJIA and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer