PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJIA vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJIA vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJIA achieves a 7.93% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 66.72% return.


DJIA

1D
0.71%
1M
2.69%
6M
5.53%
YTD
7.93%
1Y
18.10%
3Y*
11.08%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.84%

DBO

1D
-5.53%
1M
17.71%
6M
53.16%
YTD
66.72%
1Y
51.44%
3Y*
12.33%
5Y*
13.64%
10Y*
11.43%
ALL TIME*
0.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.34M$10.71M$13.49M
$1.48M$1.32M$1.41M

DJIA vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DJIA
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF
7.93%9.11%14.52%9.15%-1.07%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
66.72%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%-4.09%

Correlation

The correlation between DJIA and DBO is -0.30, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022

-0.00

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DJIA and DBO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.00 to -0.30, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJIA vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DJIA
DJIA Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DJIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJIA Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
DJIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJIA Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DJIA vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DJIADBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.23

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

1.86

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.22

5.64

+3.58

DJIA vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJIA Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJIA and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DJIA vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJIA drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJIA and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJIADBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.91%

-90.18%

+73.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-27.73%

+20.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.09%

-28.20%

+16.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-56.13%

+56.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-62.20%

+58.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

9.16%

-7.19%

Volatility

DJIA vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) is 2.41%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 18.99%. This indicates that DJIA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJIADBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

18.99%

-16.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.50%

34.30%

-27.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.66%

38.86%

-31.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.09%

33.43%

-22.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.09%

32.24%

-21.15%

DJIA vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJIA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

DJIA vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

DJIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.37%, more than DBO's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
2.11%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
DJIA
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF
10.37%10.60%11.44%7.16%9.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DJIA and DBO have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to DJIA (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJIA dropped -16.91% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 3-year performance, DBO leads with 12.33% vs 11.08% for DJIA. On fees, DJIA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, DJIA has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DBO has performed better with a 12.33% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DJIA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

DJIA has the higher dividend yield at 10.37%, compared with 2.11% for DBO.

DJIA is categorized as Derivative Income, while DBO is Oil & Gas. DJIA tracks DJIA Cboe BuyWrite v2 Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DJIA and 0.78% for DBO.

DJIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJIA and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer