PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJEL.L vs. EMRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJEL.L vs. EMRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR (DJEL.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DJEL.L is traded in GBp, while EMRD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMRD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJEL.L achieves a 9.25% return, which is significantly lower than EMRD.L's 19.61% return. Over the past 10 years, DJEL.L has outperformed EMRD.L with an annualized return of 12.49%, while EMRD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.87% annualized return.


DJEL.L

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.18%
6M
7.52%
YTD
9.25%
1Y
19.47%
3Y*
15.53%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
12.49%

EMRD.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.93%
6M
13.56%
YTD
19.61%
1Y
36.05%
3Y*
19.39%
5Y*
7.50%
10Y*
8.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJEL.L vs. EMRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DJEL.L
Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR
9.25%6.63%16.67%9.48%3.58%22.68%4.87%20.39%0.53%16.19%
EMRD.L
State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
19.61%24.62%9.53%4.25%-11.24%-1.33%14.49%12.91%-8.97%24.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DJEL.L and EMRD.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2011

0.47

The correlation between DJEL.L and EMRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.52 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJEL.L vs. EMRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJEL.L
DJEL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DJEL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJEL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJEL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DJEL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJEL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

EMRD.L
EMRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EMRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EMRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJEL.L vs. EMRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR (DJEL.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DJEL.LEMRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

3.45

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.84

9.54

-0.70

DJEL.L vs. EMRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJEL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the EMRD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJEL.L and EMRD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DJEL.L vs. EMRD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJEL.L drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, which is greater than EMRD.L's maximum drawdown of -31.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJEL.L and EMRD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJEL.LEMRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.34%

-31.27%

-11.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-10.41%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.99%

-15.26%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.99%

-22.35%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.44%

-27.33%

-1.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-10.00%

+8.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.58%

-10.35%

+3.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

3.78%

-1.58%

Volatility

DJEL.L vs. EMRD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR (DJEL.L) is 2.44%, while State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMRD.L) has a volatility of 9.01%. This indicates that DJEL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMRD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJEL.LEMRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.44%

9.01%

-6.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.24%

18.72%

-10.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.05%

20.85%

-9.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.32%

17.68%

-4.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.45%

19.03%

-3.58%

DJEL.L vs. EMRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJEL.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EMRD.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

DJEL.L vs. EMRD.L - Dividend Comparison

DJEL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, while EMRD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DJEL.L
Lyxor UCITS Dow Jones Industrial Average D-EUR
0.72%0.79%1.16%1.05%1.74%1.14%1.62%1.31%1.89%1.70%2.24%2.40%
EMRD.L
State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DJEL.L and EMRD.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMRD.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMRD.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DJEL.L.

DJEL.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EMRD.L is Emerging Markets Equities. DJEL.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while EMRD.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DJEL.L and 0.18% for EMRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJEL.L and EMRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer